College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students

City Council approves loans for solar energy

By Shabab Siddiqui

Daily Texan Staff

Print this article

Published: Friday, October 23, 2009

Updated: Friday, October 23, 2009

The Austin City Council unanimously passed a resolution Thursday afternoon that will allow Austin’s city manager to look into providing low-interest loans for homeowners to invest in energy efficient upgrades such as solar panels.

The resolution directs the city manager to investigate the possibility of implementing the energy program and to present the logistics of the program to the Council at the beginning of next year. The plan, called Project Energize, would likely replace the city’s current solar rebate program.

The resolution was sponsored by Mayor Lee Leffingwell and co-sponsored by Mayor Pro Tem Mike Martinez and Councilwoman Randi Shade.

“A successful Project Energize will make renewable energy accessible to many more local residents, help homeowners save money on their energy bills almost immediately and continue to build on Austin’s growing reputation as a national renewable energy leader,” Leffingwell said.

The vote makes Austin the first Texas city to formally act on the provisions of a new state law passed earlier this year that allows municipalities to issue tax-free, low-interest bonds to homeowners investing in energy efficiency.

The city’s proposal allows homeowners to pay off their loans directly through their property tax. Martinez said the loans allow homeowners to avoid large out-of-pocket costs, while benefiting from the energy savings immediately.

Councilwoman Sheryl Cole expressed concerns about the city’s ability to get back the money it loans out, but she ultimately supported the resolution.

Dusty Harshman, an Austin-area personal financial planner, said the program will take away the need for Austin Energy’s current solar rebate program and ultimately save the city money.

Leffingwell said the program is still far from implementation but has potential benefits for all involved.

“It doesn’t cost the city anything, it doesn’t cost the homeowner anything and it pays for itself by energy savings,” he said. “And it has the same security as your property tax bill.”

Comments

4 comments
Your name
Fri Oct 23 2009 22:07
Without some rebate money, at this point solar is too expensive for any but uber-tree-huggers. Switching Austin's solar incentives from a rebate to this property tax loan scheme, increases they payback timeline on a solar system to 15-20 years, (up from a 5-8 year payback.) On a 25 year system? I wouldn't want to be a solar installer in Austin right now.
Debbie M. soco life
Fri Oct 23 2009 21:57
Its perversely promising that the solar industry is now actually big enough to get scr--wed in smokey room politics! Isn't America awesome.
Sorry to Denied in ATX
Fri Oct 23 2009 21:52
There's a great article online in Newsweek, August?, addressing the Utilities sudden fear of small scale solar. Apparently they never thought solar prices would come down so fast, and that the systems would go in so fast. It said that last year local small-scale Solar PV contributed 5 times more megawatts of production onto the U.S. grid as all of the large-scale projects nation-wide. Further, now that PV costs are plummenting, (50% in two years,) they are trying to get the genie back in the bottle before we all supply ourselves a good portion of the electricity they want to sell us.
denied Solar Rebate in ATX
Fri Oct 23 2009 21:42
How come the City Council and Austin Energy are OK leveling $billions in surcharges to construct transmission lines to wind farms in West Texas, but are only willing to loan money for Local Solar. Why, when Austin's Solar installations were skyrocketing on only a $4.5million program? To anyone looking below the white-wash headlines a major political coup for BIG$$ was just perpetrated. Prices for Solar have been plumeting and are already cheaper than large scale remote generation projects. If you consider that Local Solar would add to the electrical generation infrastructure right here locally, and increase Local property values, and employ Local Solar workers, why would the city end the rebate program in the abrubt manor they did, and switch to loan incentives? Because "somebody" owns alot of otherwise worthless land in West Texas, and "somebody" will make $millions if not $billions on running transmission lines across Texas.






log out