College Media Network

University fires teacher for blog post

University dismisses faculty member for releasing students’ names, grades

Clay Sampson

Daily Texan Staff

Print this article

Published: Monday, November 17, 2008

Updated: Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Texas A&M International University in Laredo fired a professor for publishing the names of students accused of plagiarism.

In his syllabus, professor Loye Young wrote that he would “promptly and publicly fail and humiliate anyone caught lying, cheating or stealing.” After he discovered six students had plagiarized on an essay, Young posted their names on his blog, resulting in his firing last week.

“It’s really the only way to teach the students that it’s inappropriate,” he said.

Young, a former adjunct professor of management information systems, said he believes he made the right move. He said trials are public for a reason, and plagiarism should be treated the same way. He added that exposing cheaters is an effective deterrent.

“They were told the consequences in the syllabus,” he said. “They didn’t believe it.”

The six students received F’s and were reported to the school, but their grades may not stand because of Young’s blog post, according to insidehighered.com.

Young, who also operates a computer business in Laredo, was terminated for violating the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, a federal law that prohibits the release of students’ educational records without consent. But he said he does not believe he infringed on anyone’s privacy.

“You have to hold them accountable,” he said. “If you don’t, you hold a grave danger of having an illiterate society.”

Renita Coleman, a UT assistant professor who taught a journalism course on ethics in the spring, said there are better ways to handle plagiarism.

“I don’t think that it serves anybody well to publicly humiliate them,” she said. “It doesn’t teach anybody that it’s wrong.”

Coleman said each university has specific guidelines for dealing with cheating, and situational factors should be taken into account. She said she has dealt with repentant plagiarists who weren’t punished severely since they said they learned a lesson.

“Admitting your mistake and making an effort to fix it goes a long way,” she said. “Motivations matter.”

Coleman added that privacy should be considered in the instance of plagiarism.

“It’s not the same violation as, say, robbing a house,” she said. “It’s not something that’s an illegal act.”

While Coleman stressed that a university is a learning environment, Young said students who plagiarize should be publicly responsible.

“I think we went wrong when we, leaders, decided better self-esteem meant better learning,” he said. “But in fact, it’s the opposite.”

Comments

102 comments
Miranda
Sat Nov 29 2008 18:03
@ Confused Student: I like how you said that the professor "broke the trust between him and his students". You break someone's trust with you when you lie to them. He said in his syllabus that he would take those exact actions, therefore, I don't see how the students would have been misled. The irony of your statement also strikes me considering the fact that the students were the cheating liars in the whole ordeal and THEY are the ones who broke the trust.

Being namby pamby about punishing people when they're wrong does nothing to deter bad behavior. If they hadn't been publicly humiliated, they probably would just continue taking their chances with cheating. Now, everyone knows they have cheated and they know that they must be on their toes and do their own work because they will be watched closely.

Props to the prof!

Your name
Tue Nov 25 2008 11:34
I think the University made a mistake in firing Professor Young. What those students did was wrong and they should be punished for their actions. Professor Young clearly stated in his syllabus that he “promptly and publicly fail and humiliate anyone caught lying, cheating or stealing" and that is what he did. I do not feel sorry for those students, They're the type of people who will do anything to get what they want without a thought for whether it is wrong.
confused student
Sun Nov 23 2008 03:01
The guy did break a law. More importantly, he broke the trust between him and his students. How is the university going to keep a professor that will continue to do this kind of thing. Based on his quotes, he does not seem to believe that he did anything wrong. The university had all the rights to fire him because he is not admitting to his mistakes. I, for one, would not like my classmates, let alone the entire internet, to know if I plagiarized my paper or not, and I'm sure nobody else would either.

Still, this does not dismiss the students who plagiarized. They should not be excused from their punishment only because their professor was fired. The scandal in front of this should not steer the university away from the real problem. The students should get punished because, irregardless if he posted the list on his blog or not, it was still plagiarism. I always work hard to not plagiarize because I know I can get into big trouble for it. Every college student knows that consequences of plagiarism, and they should be punished accordingly.

marc
Thu Nov 20 2008 09:24
If they didnt cheat, how is the professor going to humiliate them?

One of the students' parents must have some illegal rights to fire the professor.

Let's say what the professor did was wrong, he gets fired, then the students should be expelled as well.

Your name
Thu Nov 20 2008 09:09
have to say... that if it was in the syllabus, then the students seem to have consented to it by being in the class. they could have dropped the class and taken it with another instructor or otherwise worked around this, but by staying in the class, it looks very clear to me that they accept the terms.




Verify you are human: