College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

UT prepares teachers for Bible classes

By Ryan Moore

Daily Texan Staff

Print this article

Published: Friday, August 7, 2009

Updated: Friday, August 7, 2009

L. Michael White

Edmarc Hedrick/The Daily Texan

L. Michael White, UT classics research professor, delivers a biblical lecture to educators from around the state on Thursday.

Over four days, UT professors and scholars from the Department of Religious Studies prepared high school teachers to teach a new and controversial addition to the state public school curriculum — the Bible.

During the 2007 legislative session, Gov. Rick Perry signed a bill that requires Old Testament and New Testament history and literature to be added to Texas high school curriculum. The legislation states that all school districts must offer a course as an elective for the 2009-2010 school year if more than 15 students show interest.

“We can’t impart a particular viewpoint on students, but we also must acknowledge that other viewpoints exist and respect that,” said L. Michael White, a UT classics research professor.

The “Teaching the Bible in Texas Public Schools” Summer Institute was hosted by the religious studies department and designed to give teachers the framework to instruct their students about the Bible in an academic and scholarly context.

White, one of the biblical scholars who instructed the class, said the mandate came about without a set curriculum or training for the teachers, so they felt obligated to provide it.

Some critics harshly oppose providing a Bible course in public schools, saying that it would be nearly impossible to keep religious bias out of the classroom.

“Clearly, the motivation is religious. It obviously violates the establishment clause,” said UT philosophy professor Sahotra Sarkar. “There is no question this is motivated by religious extremism.”

On March 5, the American Civil Liberties Union won a lawsuit that challenged the constitutionality of a Bible course that was taught in a West Texas public school. According to the lawsuit, the course promoted religion, which is something the institute is trying to stop in these new course electives.

The institute devoted the first day of the class to First Amendment rights. White stressed that it is essential for the classes to remain unbiased and examine the documents in a literary context.

“There’s a constitutional issue there, and that’s when lawsuits happen,” White said.

Other pitfalls in teaching such a class include upsetting someone who has been taught to interpret the Bible in a certain way according to their tradition, which may not match up with the way it is taught in their class, White said.

The summer institute covered nearly the entire bible in less than a week, as well as the legal dangers that teachers and schools face when discussing what is a very personal subject for some people.

There are no special requirements or training necessary to teach one these classes, noted Kent Richards, executive director of the Society of Biblical Literature and one of the institute’s lecturers. He said the Bible could be a valuable tool to help a well-rounded education if taught properly.

“This is why it’s important to have an 11th and 12th grade bible course to get them to understand the wonderful dynamic between people, cultures and religions in the past,” Richards said in the class on Thursday.

Brant Bird said he enjoyed the summer classes and said they would be very helpful for the class he will be teaching in the upcoming year for the Pleasanton Independent School District. He said he could see some people becoming upset but is not worried since the Legislature backs the courses.

“It’s important. I think the Bible has had influence over so many things in our world today in a non-religious way — like art, movies, literature” Bird said, “It’s the most-sold book; seeing it in a non-religious way is important.”

The instructors said they hope the class will give the teachers a suitable foundation to competently teach students about the texts without infringing on students’ religious beliefs. 

“We’re not trying to make them biblical scholars,” Richards said. “We’re trying to help them become intellectually responsible.”

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

35 comments

DFW Chris
Wed Nov 18 2009 23:25
Paul K., moral and ethical principles found in the bible like slavery, misogyny, rape, genocide, and human sacrifice?
carolyn
Sun Sep 27 2009 10:53
what ordained title should a woman choose when she becomes ordained such as minister, pastor, reverened,etc.
Paul Kurek
Fri Aug 28 2009 10:18
The beginning of public education in this country utilized the Bible as a text, and I see no reason that practice should not be continued. It is important to note that our country was founded on Judeo-Christian principles. One of those principles is religious tolerance - the right for each person to worship or believe in God as she or he sees fit. Even so, George Washington wrote, "It is impossible to govern rightly without God and the Bible." I did not like reading some of the mean spirited comments on both sides of this issue, they were neither Christian nor good karma. It is good to discuss controversial issues, but let's do it with civility and respect for each other. I personally think that teaching some of the moral and ethical principles contained in the Bible would serve to make a better and more peaceful world.
Kmita
Sun Aug 16 2009 03:18
I'd rather take a class on "Journey to the West" than the bible. The books are about the same length. They're both full of religious material. They're both fictional. The difference? One is actually fun to read (hint: not the bible)! Jesus hasn't got anything on the monkey king.

Really texas... can you get any sillier?

Bob
Sat Aug 15 2009 10:00
It was a course such as this, The Historical Jesus, that made me realize that Christians (as well as all the other religions of the world) were fools and idiots, and I've been blissfully and happily logical ever since. So go ahead, Texas, proselytize your young, knock yourself out. You'll just drive them awat from you and make them hate you, and they'll move away, problem solved. On a side note, I find it mildly hilarious that I can score a ten strip of blotter acid just a couple hundred yards away from where this "class" is taking place.....wait.....LSD....water supply...makes you think, doesn't it?
Anyway, the majority of Texans are buffoons, and I'm glad I no longer live there.
Happy, Loving God and Life
Wed Aug 12 2009 09:44
“Finally, all of you should be of one mind. Sympathize with each other. Love each other as brothers and sisters. Be tenderhearted, and keep a humble attitude. Don’t repay evil for evil. Don’t retaliate with insults when people insult you. Instead, pay them back with a blessing. That is what God has called you to do, and he will bless you for it. For the Scriptures say,
‘If you want to enjoy life
and see many happy days,
keep your tongue from speaking evil
and your lips from telling lies.
Turn away from evil and do good.
Search for peace, and work to maintain it.’ ” First Peter 3:8-11

So now please try and find fault in that.

Praying for you...
Wed Aug 12 2009 09:33
For every atheist making a comment... I challenge YOU to study the Bible. His Word will not return void. (Isaiah 55:11)
zappa rules
Tue Aug 11 2009 12:24
As an atheist, I think this is great. If more people read the Old T. and Dueteronomy from an unbiased viewpoint, I think the absurdity, brutality, genocidal insanity and evil that pervades that horrible book would become quite clear.
Rick Dickens
Mon Aug 10 2009 15:38
Texas,
Please secede from the U.S. You are embarrassing us all.
Thanks.
Christian Man
Mon Aug 10 2009 12:44
This is great, if this was a class on any other religion there would not be hearly this much response, and my guess is the response would be much more positive celebrating diversity and multiculturalism. It just goes to show that Jesus Christ still has a way of gettng peoples attention. He is impossible to ignore. Please keep ranting.
James Sweet
Mon Aug 10 2009 09:49
Look, this is simple: Are they making the same requirement about the text of ANY major world religion? (although even this would have 1st amendment issues, because what about non-religious elective texts?) If it is only for the text of a single religion, then it's an unconstitutional endorsement of that religion. We don't even have to examine the stickier issues involved, e.g. whether this elective is a good idea at the high school level (probably not) or whether religious bias could be kept out of such a class (almost certainly not). Even if I'm wrong and it could be a completely unbiased and valuable class, it's STILL unconstitutional because Texans would pitch a fit if electives were being offered on the Quran or Bagavad Gita.
Your name
Sun Aug 9 2009 20:21
The problem with your remarks James B is that you forget that our country was formed because our learned forefathers wanted to break the yoke of servitude to a tyrannical government. One of the principles of the constitution was the separation of church and state. They understood that too much power concentrated would ultimately lead to tyranny.

While you might long for the day when the world was ruled by Christian tyrants who dispensed justice directly from the scriptures, I would rather live in a country of rational laws. Any erosion of the separation of church and state should be defended against with the passion that our forefathers fought for our independence.

You cite all the problems in our society over the past 30-40 years and imply that if we would all just accept your "TRUTH" then all these problems would just go away. The problem is that there are just so many people out there with their own brand of "TRUTH" that all claim the same thing. Of course they all have their own book, or their own interpretation.

They say that "Texas is like a whole 'nother country" and I agree. It's like Iran and the distinctions are getting smaller and smaller. No thanks James B. I don't need your TRUTH. I personally think it would be easier for you to move to Iran, switch your book of choice, and live the life of contentment with all of the other happy citizens of Iran.

alumni
Sun Aug 9 2009 16:18
As a native Texan who now live in Kansas, I am embarrassed about what the fanatical religious right has done to hijack education there. Rick Perry is a real piece of crap for allowing this to happen. We already went through this nonsense in Kansas. I hope Texans vote these religious fascists out of office.
Andy London UK
Sun Aug 9 2009 16:08
What a backward lot you are. The time you are spending teaching kids about your favourite imaginary friend it time taken away from more valuable lessons. I thought church was for teaching about the bible.

This is just a way for your bigoted governor to get religion taught in schools. No ifs. No buts. You can get degrees now at university in The Simpsons. If you're going to waste an hour of a students time at school then it would be better spent on the finer points of the family from Springfield and a lot more fun.

Trying to make kids religious is child abuse. Rather than asking questions and learning all they have to do is think god did it and that's it.

Is it just the bible that is being studied? Are they teaching about the Koran too and all the other books that say their made up friend is better than all the others?

Teach your kids about civics, the consitution, history and that there is a land outside the usa that they could learn from. Open your eyes Texas because Gov Perry is trying to close them.

Hugh
Sun Aug 9 2009 05:33
To teach about the bible (and the Qu'ran, and the Bhagavad Gita, etc.) from an external historical perspective would be valuable, but comments like James B's suggest that that won't happen. Will they even teach that, for example, Moses and Abraham were probably not historical and the Egyptian captivity probably never took place? And as for John 8:32, what if the truth should prove to be that we are automata?
Your name
Sun Aug 9 2009 02:44
How on earth does this pass the Lemon Test?

I understand that they are trying to use the the pretense of the Bible being "literature" and "history", but how can a state law that does nothing but mandate the teaching of one religious book not practically reek with government entanglement with religion?

Mark
Sun Aug 9 2009 02:01
It'll be interesting to review this in a year's time to see how many courses are really teaching "about" the bible - its origins, its impact on western literature, history, society etc, and how many are using it as a back door to propagate their superstitious beliefs about it.. I suspect one could predict, with a very high level of accuracy, exactly which camp each class will fall into given the credentials of the teacher and the type of school.

I agree with previous commenters that to be of any real value this course also has to touch on other similar books such as the Koran, the book of Mormon, the Vedas and Dianetics.

jsx
Sun Aug 9 2009 01:57
If this course is correctly put together, it would be a very useful course in turning people away from religion. The historical context and background first and foremost shows why some of the books were written, added, changed, redacted, censored, removed, badly translated, copied from other religions and generally aren't worth the paper they're printed on. Then one can look at the moral lessons being taught when it promotes child abuse, rape and the odd murder. The inconsistancies and contradictions are also important. However I fear it won't be taught like that. Pieces will be taken completely out of context, including out of as I mentioned above historical context. If students are allowed to question things then it might have some use but I fear.....
Wayne Robinson
Sun Aug 9 2009 01:00
Good idea. I expect the number of atheists will increase enormously, as more students read the Bible.
Paul Ignoble
Sat Aug 8 2009 20:09
Paul, where do you get your facts from? And what do you even know about other religions? Thats like me saying that all catholics are pedophiles. You are probably a small minded little nothing. And all you can do is vomit hatred and misdirection from your heart and being. You seem to hate, which isn't a Christian value. You are the type of person who can't see himself as fallible. Somehow your hatred isn't the same that extremist's have for Christianity. Somehow you are better than that and somehow you are right when they are wrong. You and Stephen Bass are the same as those extremists. You both think you are right, when you all together are wrong. You are both ignorant and Paul, I bet you have to use dictionary.com to find out that I was making a play on words when I used ignoble to make fun of you. You two are the definition of the word.






log out