College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students

Perry's 200th Execution Sparks Worldwide Protest

By Pierre Bertrand

Daily Texan Staff

Print this article

Published: Wednesday, June 3, 2009

Updated: Wednesday, June 3, 2009

Dozens of death penalty opponents gathered on the steps of the Texas Capitol Tuesday evening to protest the 200th execution under Gov. Rick Perry, which was scheduled for 6 p.m.

Perry’s approval of the execution of Terry Lee Hankins marks the highest number of executions performed by any governor in American history. Hankins, who shot his wife and child in their sleep, has previously described himself as a “non-caring monster.”

Austin’s protest took place in conjunction with similar protests taking places in the country and around the world, including Houston, Albuquerque, Liepzig, German and Paris, France.

The Austin protestors, holding signs and placards, crowded the Capitol’s entrance along Congress Avenue. A symbolic “burial” took place where 200 candles were placed one by one in a cardboard coffin. The names of each person executed, and the crime they had committed was announced at the sound of a bell.

Alexis Konevich, a philosophy senior at St. Edwards University and intern for the Texas Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty, said executions were ethically and morally wrong and do not support her personal moral beliefs.

“By the standards of our Constitution, I believe it is cruel and unusual punishment,” Konevich said.

Scott Cobb, president of the Texas Moratorium Network said the protests, organized by anti-execution organizations, served to demonstrate that people are opposed to the use of the death penalty in Texas.

“Texas just executes more people than other states,” Cobb said. “When you travel abroad, and you say you are from Texas, the first thing that comes to mind is executions and maybe cowboys.”

Cobb said he would be protesting outside the Huntsville prison where Texas executes those on death row.

“I think that people will have an effect on public opinion and policy makers,” Cobb said.

Kristin Houlé, the director for the Texas Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty, who was present at the Capitol’s protest, said as people become more educated on the topic and understand the complexity of the practice, support for the death penalty is starting to wane.

“You can’t help but feel a sense of sadness for the lose of life on both sides,” Houlé said six minutes before Terry Hankins was scheduled to die.

The governor’s office did not return calls to The Daily Texan by press time.

Comments

26 comments
The Cowardly Liberal
Thu Jun 4 2009 12:11
Leonard, I hope you don't end up on death row anytime soon.

Your moral compass is bent, battered and broken. Judge not others, lest ye be judged.

Leonard Martinez
Wed Jun 3 2009 22:44
Rick Perry and the State of Texas kick ass. Decades ago Gary Gilmore had term to describe sanctimonious nihilists like the protesters at this murderer's execution: moral cowards. Someone who does not know the difference between good and evil is worth nothing. –Miecyslaw Kasprzyk, Polish rescuer of Jews during the Holocaust, New York Times, Jan. 30, 2005
The Cowardly Liberal
Wed Jun 3 2009 20:23
Gonzo, the pregnant woman making her own choices about her own body is speaking for the life inside her.

Deal with it.

Lance Kellogg
Wed Jun 3 2009 19:16
Cobb must travel to strange places in the World...for me, I have traveled international for years now and on a regular bases and have never been once asked about "cowboys and the death penalty" when I tell people I'm from Texas...most are impressed by my being a Texan first, and a USA citizen second...have a nice day.
Gonzo1347
Wed Jun 3 2009 18:20
To the cowardly liberal..."women making choices about their own bodies"...who's speaking for the life inside her? Is that baby getting a fair chance at life? People say, well what if she was raped and she doesn't want the baby? Well, there are plenty of other people out there that would love the chance to adopt an unwanted child. It's funny how some of you say it's OK to end an innocent life before it has a chance to experience it, but to exterminate a monster that will probably kill again, if given the chance, is murder. What about the biblical law that said an "eye for eye"? As far as the People of Texas, execution, well the Governor speaks for the people...and I would hate to make the decision he has to make concerning another person's life. He made his choice when he decided to take other INNOCENT lives, now he must pay, both here, and in the hereafter.
Your name
Wed Jun 3 2009 18:17
To the cowardly liberal..."women making choices about their own bodies"...who's speaking for the life inside her? Is that baby getting a fair chance at life? People say, well what if she was raped and she doesn't want the baby? Well, there are plenty of other people out there that would love the chance to adopt an unwanted child. It's funny how some of you say it's OK to end an innocent life before it has a chance to experience it, but to exterminate a monster that will probably kill again, if given the chance, is murder. What about the biblical law that said an "eye for eye"? As far as the People of Texas, execution, well the Governor speaks for the people...and I would hate to make the decision he has to make concerning another person's life. He made his choice when he decided to take other INNOCENT lives, now he must pay, both here, and in the hereafter.
Julie
Wed Jun 3 2009 17:56
And it never made any sense to me how people from the right wing could be against abortion and for the death penalty. Their arguments against abortion all start out "Only God gets to decide when life begins and ends..." but apparently if a human being commits any kind of crime, they forfeit that privilege and people get to be God and decide when they will die. I personally am against both, as that seems to be the only truly morally defensible position. Terry Hankins might have been some kind of monster, but he was still a human being and I don't get to decide when he dies.
Julie
Wed Jun 3 2009 17:55
And it never made any sense to me how people from the right wing could be against abortion and for the death penalty. Their arguments against abortion all start out "Only God gets to decide when life begins and ends..." but apparently if a human being commits any kind of crime, they forfeit that privilege and people get to be God and decide when they will die. I personally am against both, as that seems to be the only truly morally defensible position. Terry Hankins might have been some kind of monster, but he was still a human being and I don't get to decide when he dies.
hippiehater
Wed Jun 3 2009 17:28
Unconstitutional? Is "Founders' Intent" not a paramount component of what is or is not constitutional?
sell
Wed Jun 3 2009 16:50
the same people protested that protest at every single one of these things. They have a complex which drives them to seek attention for themselves and be held up by the rest of society as being some sort of savior that's better than everyone else. they are a bunch of arrogant freaks that think they have more of a right to decide what happens to criminals versus the other 80% of Americans that happen to be in the same social contract as themselves.
The Cowardly Liberal
Wed Jun 3 2009 16:43
Once someone's dead, you can't punish them any further. All you can do is hope there is a hell for them. What if there's nothing? Punishment is for the living. If you really hate them, hope they have a long life in which to suffer.

Life begins at 40.

Informed.
Wed Jun 3 2009 16:29
Terry Hankins shot his wife and their 2 children....and when he was caught he admitted to killing and hiding the bodies of his sister and father 10 months earlier....
CaptainmyI
Wed Jun 3 2009 16:23
That bastard will burn in hell
CaptainmyI
Wed Jun 3 2009 16:22
That bastard will burn in hell
J.J.GARCIA
Wed Jun 3 2009 16:21
"Cruel and unusuel punishment?" When self-proclaimed non-caring monster, Terry Lee Hankins, shot and murdered his wife and child while they slept, did these so-called good hearted folks protesting Hankin's execution, did they protest this senseless and brutal double murder of these two innocent victims? I know what it is to be an innocent victim of a violent crime in Texas. Maybe "all" these protesting folks should get be shot or stabbed by strangers, for no good reason at all, for them to learn the anguish to be a victim of a violent crime. I do hope that Hankins is terminated today. He committed the highest crime in the country not only once but twice, now it's his term to suffer the consequences.
CaptainmyI
Wed Jun 3 2009 16:19
I hope that bastard burns in hell...
Jonathan Mullen
Wed Jun 3 2009 16:07
Personally I support the death penalty. Too many who serve time and end up being released kill again. Also why should the people support a killer for the duration of their lives? if the person killed could have, they would have killed the murderer in self defense. Then everyone would say good, you protected yourself or loved ones. The death penalty is not about revenge but consequences for their actions. And by definition of insanity all killers could be innocent by that means. A line should be drawn. Societies are weak and we are less safe because we enable the offenders.
Joan
Wed Jun 3 2009 16:06
What would you be saying if it was one of your own that was being executed? I live in a prison town and executions happen here as well and when someone says something I ask them the above question and the reply I get is OH THAT IS DIFFERENT? How different? When did the states play God? The states that do executions are committing murder as well. God is the only one that can judge not the state not the people etc. What happened to live without parole? What closure do the victims get????? Please lets wake up and be realistic here. Thank you
Your name
Wed Jun 3 2009 16:05
Personally I support the death penalty. Too many who serve time and end up being released kill again. Also why should the people support a killer for the duration of their lives? if the person killed could have, they would have killed the murderer in self defense. Then everyone would say good, you protected yourself or loved ones. The death penalty is not about revenge but consequences for their actions. And by definition of insanity all killers could be innocent by that means. A line should be drawn. Societies are weak and we are less safe because we enable the offenders.
Tyler
Wed Jun 3 2009 15:22
The person does not deserve to continue to breathe and live off our tax dollars and make a mockery of our judicial system. The only REAL problem(s)  with the death penalty is that it is not used enough and it takes too long for the scum to be executed.