College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students

The Firing Line: 05/08/09

By The Daily Texan

Print this article

Published: Friday, May 8, 2009

Updated: Friday, May 8, 2009

Pom reject repugnant

I feel bad for the girl with the armpit hair who wrote the article describing the Pom Squad as a talentless spirit organization that chooses girls based on “90 percent” looks because she has been constantly living in the shadow of better, prettier girls ever since she became the captain of her second-rate high school dance team that nobody paid any attention to (“Confessions of a would-be Pom Girl,” May 1).

What kind of criteria should these girls really be judged on? Who has spent the most time helping homeless children? Who can’t really dance but still manages to give it 110 percent? Who’s smile really shouts out, “I may be ugly, but I’ll pretend to be proud of it”? 

While you’re busy contemplating these questions, I’ll be holding a football tryout. I’m looking for a bunch of 5’6’ guys who are nearsighted and barely weigh more than 120 pounds. I’m sure they would make for a winning team.

Instead of putting down spirit organizations for which the members volunteer and dedicate themselves to representing our university with class and pride, you should try trimming some of your famed armpit hair and donating it to Locks of Love so you can do something positive.

Shane Grodin
Economics sophomore

 

Alleged assumption

In Audrey Campbell’s May 7 editorial “Dishonest Lifestyles” regarding an upcoming documentary that examines allegedly closeted Republican politicians that oppose gay rights, she wrote “Each politician represented in the film exhibits conservative bias and discriminates against the gay community. Sometimes the discrimination even extends to the closeted gay conservative politicians themselves,” and then Florida Gov. Charlie Crist and California Rep. David Dreier are given as examples.

As I read it, she implied that Charlie Crist and David Dreier are closeted homosexuals.

These are claims the documentary (which I have not seen) makes, and while they certainly may be true, I do not think they are established facts, and they should not be presented as such. Next time around it might be a good idea to plug in the word “alleged” somewhere in there.

Also — regarding the May 6 article “For Atheletes, a Different Kind of Test,” the Major League Baseball season is 162 games long (not 160), and if a team makes it to the World Series, the maximum number of games it could play would be 162 + 5 (max division series length) + 7 (max LCS length) + 7 (max world series length) = 181 (not 196).

John Barry
Computer sciences senior

Comments

5 comments
Edward Oden
Wed May 27 2009 01:09
At least "alleged" gay GOP politicians have the good sense to know their "alleged" lifestyles are wrong and not permissible to promote openly. Homosexuality is both morally repugnant and scientifically unnatural. The only natural union is between one man and one woman-and if building a family, entering into a marriage. If you wish to engage in Sodomy, leave the State out of it! Gay marriage, partnerships, benefits, adoptions-Texans know better.
whowhahuh?
Mon May 11 2009 12:16
What kind of criteria should these girls really be judged on?

How they look in chaps. And they look good.

Skeptical
Fri May 8 2009 10:51
I heard Kirby Diq discussing his documentary, "Outrage," on NPR when I was driving home the other day. The interviewer, Terry Gross, actually raised the issue that she was uncomfortable discussing the individuals mentioned in the documentary, since she hadn't seen independent corroboration of the claims and didn't want to be a party to that kind of speculation if it turned out to be untrue. Diq, of course, said that these things were well known in the alternative/gay media, but didn't follow up with specific instances of how these people were known to be closeted gays. It's a reflection of the Daily Texan's politics that they show less restraint than NPR.

Diq says that the theme of the documentary isn't really about how closeted gays (alleged and actual) hurt the gay rights movement, but is actually about hypocrisy in politics. This seems interesting to me because hypocrisy has much broader applicability, both in the number of people involved and in political affiliation, than just a few Republicans. There's nothing wrong with a documentary like this if the facts are spot-on, but I dislike the attempt to sell it as something broader than it is.

On a final note, I had to replace the "ck" with a "q" in Diq to pass the DT filter. This is silly.

Skeptical
Fri May 8 2009 10:47
I heard Kirby Dick discussing his documentary, "Outrage," on NPR when I was driving home the other day. The interviewer (Terry Gross) actually raised the issue that she was uncomfortable discussing the individuals mentioned in the documentary, since she hadn't seen independent corroboration of the claims and didn't want to be a party to that kind of speculation if it turned out to be untrue. Dick, of course, said that these things were well known in the alternative/gay media, but didn't follow up with specific instances of how these people were known to be closeted gays. It's a reflection of the Daily Texan's politics that they show less restraint than NPR.

He says that the theme of the documentary isn't really about how closeted gays (alleged and actual) hurt the gay rights movement, but is actually about hypocrisy in politics. This seems interesting to me because hypocrisy has much broader applicability -- both in the number of people involved, and in political affiliation -- than just a few Republicans. There's nothing wrong with a documentary like this if the facts are spot-on, but I dislike the attempt to sell it as something broader than it is.

Skeptical
Fri May 8 2009 10:46
I heard Kirby Dick discussing his documentary, "Outrage," on NPR when I was driving home the other day. The interviewer (Terry Gross) actually raised the issue that she was uncomfortable discussing the individuals mentioned in the documentary, since she hadn't seen independent corroboration of the claims and didn't want to be a party to that kind of speculation if it turned out to be untrue. Dick, of course, said that these things were well known in the alternative/gay media, but didn't follow up with specific instances of how these people were known to be closeted gays. It's a reflection of the Daily Texan's politics that they show less restraint than NPR on this matter.

He says that the theme of the documentary isn't really about how closeted gays (alleged and actual) hurt the gay rights movement, but is actually about hypocrisy in politics. This is interesting to me because hypocrisy has much broader applicability -- both in the number of people involved, and in political affiliation -- than just a few Republicans. There's nothing wrong with a documentary like this if the facts are spot-on, but I dislike the attempt to sell it as something broader than it is.







log out