Philip Huang

Gov. Rick Perry in a press conference Friday recommended a ban on travel from countries affected by Ebola.

Photo Credit: Michael Baez | Daily Texan Staff

President William Powers Jr. announced Friday that a University student was on the same flight as a health care worker who has tested positive for the Ebola virus, but the student is not showing any symptoms.

According to Powers, the student was onboard Frontier Airlines flight 1143 on Oct. 13. Amber Vinson, a nurse at Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital in Dallas who was involved in the care of Ebola patient Thomas Eric Duncan, was also on board the flight and was later diagnosed with Ebola. Powers said in an email to the UT community that the student was not sitting near Vinson on the flight.

“The student was not seated in the zone of concern on the plane, is not showing any symptoms, is monitoring body temperature, and is in daily contact with health officials, according to recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,” Powers said in an email sent to the UT community. “The student has been fully compliant beyond the CDC recommendations for possible Ebola exposure.”

At a press conference Friday at Austin City Hall to discuss the matter, Philip Huang, medical director and health authority for the Austin/Travis County Health and Human Services Department said out of an abundance of caution, the student is voluntarily restricting his or her own activities.

“This individual is very low-risk, and from a public health standpoint, there are no restrictions that have been recommended,” Huang said. “This is not someone who has Ebola.”

Currently, three people in total have been diagnosed with the Ebola virus in the U.S. Huang said as Ebola is transmitted through contact with blood and bodily fluids, and there is no evidence of the University student coming in contact with these substances.

“The people who have developed Ebola disease in Dallas were health care professionals that were [directly] dealing with the patient,” Huang said. “In that setting, that’s a whole lot more exposure.”

Powers said in his email that the student would be staying home from class at their private residence. He or she will not return to school until Nov. 3, according to Bob Harkins, associate vice president for campus safety and security, who also spoke at the press conference.

Harkins said he has already talked to some parents of University students with general concerns about the virus, and he anticipates there will be more calls. He said the University has an infectious disease plan that is revisited it every year in case of an endemic. 

“We visited it back in July, specifically to look at what were doing in the event that we did have an Ebola outbreak,” Harkins said.  “All of the agencies on campus – whether that’s Housing, or Student Affairs or the provost’s office – have specific tasks that they’ve gone through now to upgrade our perfection levels, as has the Medical Center. We feel that we’re about as ready as we can be to try and ward off any of the bad infections.”

This story has been updated since its original publication.

Events Coordinator of Spiderhouse Ballroom Jessica Ryan smokes while working on the patio outside of Spiderhouse Cafe on 29th and Fruth St. Thursday afternoon.

Photo Credit: Maria Arrellaga | Daily Texan Staff

The public areas where smokers can enjoy lighting up may dwindle further as public health advocates fight to clear the air of the dangerous risks of secondhand smoke to Austinites.

The city placed a permanent ban on smoking in city parks in December 2011. Smoke-Free Austin advocacy group, a community group made up of Austin citizens, recently proposed a policy that would further limit smoking throughout the city. The proposal would extend the city’s ban to patios, balconies and other outdoor spaces.

While there is no proposed bill yet, the group is gathering signatures for a policy endorsement statement and is expecting the Travis County Medical Association to back the policy as well, said Jennifer Conroy, founder of Smoke-Free Austin advocacy group.

Conroy said the policy, if passed by the City Council, would benefit the vast majority of Austin’s population.

“We’re accommodating a very small number of people, and that association has harmful risks for people who are exposed to it,” Conroy said. “There are very few occasions when the law would allow us to be exposed to any other class-A carcinogen. Why would we be allowed to be exposed to this and so frequently?”

Conroy said the ultimate goal is to completely eliminate public smoking areas in the city.

“Our effort is to try to prevent people from being exposed to smoke in public spaces,” she said. “We started with smoke-free parks, and it was a logical extension to work on smoke-free patios, which makes sense because people are in much closer proximity to one another on patios.”

Nicholas Velez, a government and social work sophomore, said attempting to further limit smoking areas is unjust to the smoking population.

“As a smoker, I don’t really believe it’s fair,” Velez said. “You have a right to do with your body as you want. I understand increased taxation to really compensate for increased medical costs that the government might pay later on in life, but straight out banning it isn’t fair.”

Dr. Philip Huang, medical director for the Austin Health & Human Services Department, said collected data consistently supports making public outdoor areas smoke-free.

“For us at the health department, we just look at data and information,” Huang said. “We also look at the data on the percentage of current smokers, and in Austin and Travis County it’s maybe 15 percent. So you have around 85 percent non-smokers, which is just a growing majority of people who are really bothered by breathing in secondhand smoke.”

Huang said the city park smoking ban passed in 2011 caused several previous opponents of the ban to change their minds because it became easier to quit.

“We have done some surveys of the smokers in Travis County,” Huang said. “Seventy percent of them want to quit, and 59 percent have quit in the last year. A lot of people end up liking [these changes].”

Matt Haviland, public health senior and health and wellness policy adviser for UT Student Government, said banning more public smoking areas could have further positive effects on the health of current smokers.

“Personally, I think it’s going to help some people get over their addiction,” Haviland said. “Whether they’re for or against it, I think it’s important for people to voice their opinions on public health issues and let City Council know how they feel.”

Nick Rutland, bartender at The Local Pub & Patio located on Guadalupe Street, said banning smoking in bars is counterintuitive to the reasons people go to bars in the first place.

“Open air is open air, and a bar is also a bar,” Rutland said. “This is where people go where there are vices galore. They are inherently not healthy environments — people are drinking. I think if you want to smoke, a bar patio is the perfect place to do it.”

Published on January 25, 2013 as "City considers expanding smoking ban".