College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students

Partying like hell

By Daniel Earnest

Daily Texan Columnist

Print this article

Published: Friday, April 17, 2009

Updated: Friday, April 17, 2009

On Wednesday, in more than 300 locations and in every state in the Union, ordinary people assembled at city halls and state capitals to protest higher taxes and unrestrained government spending at TEA (“taxed enough already”) parties. At these gatherings, people held up signs saying that they were “mad as hell” and that they were “partying like it was 1774.”

When I first heard the idea, I wrote it off as something that was barely significant. But the more I learned about the protests, the keener I became on their idea and purpose. Most of the tea parties were not organized by a political party or by politicians but by normal citizens who mobilized their own communities.

In fact, Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele was respectfully turned down when he requested to be a part of the proceedings at the tea party in Chicago. The organizers of the event declined Steele’s request to speak by saying that “this is an opportunity for Americans to speak and elected officials to listen, not the other way around.”

In a time where politicians from both parties are attempting to be the heroic firemen who can extinguish the current economic blaze, this is the exact extinguisher that America needs. Americans need to gather together, regardless of party, color or religion and hold our elected officials accountable for the things that they do.

Also, for the Republican Party, the tea parties may serve as a highly effective wake-up call. Regardless of what CNN reporter Susan Roesgen said, the tea parties were not a part of the vast right-wing conspiracy or part of Fox News’s Republican agenda. Sure, conservatives definitely favor small government and low taxation, but a lot of people who value these things have been ostracized by the GOP in the last eight years.

Republicans have been just as guilty as Democrats in the recent past for increasing the size of government — and this is where Republicans have gone astray on their overall message. It is time that Republicans start touting their small- government principals, and I think that these initial tea parties (yes, there will be more) are just the catalyst that is needed to shake the dust off of the old, white-headed GOP.

But what does this mean for us as college students? While some youths attended the tea parties, the number of college students in attendance was not formidable enough to justify it being called a youth movement. Most of the protestors were middle-aged and older American citizens.

However, with the way things are going, there definitely should be overwhelming youth involvement in protesting the “pass the buck” economic policies of the Obama administration because, well, it directly affects every single one of us.

President Barack Obama promised during his campaign to not pass our current problems to future generations. But his eagerness to tax and spend since he has been in office suggests that this may have been just a part of the rest of his empty campaign rhetoric.

When he exited office, former President George W. Bush left a $5.8 trillion national debt. But if Obama were to serve eight years as president, The Heritage Foundation estimates that the national debt would increase to something along the lines of $12.5 trillion by 2019.

Now, even if you have faith that all the spending and taxing that Obama is doing is going to solve the current problem, it is worth noticing that his economic policies are also going to create new problems in terms of the aforementioned national debt. And, theoretically speaking, this gargantuan debt must be paid off by someone, someday.

Enter you — the college-aged American citizen who will be working for at least the next 35-40 years. It is us, our generation, who will foot this incredibly exorbitant bill.

So while college students remain relatively unaffected by the current economic crisis, we should begin thinking about our futures and the futures that our elected officials are paving for us, regardless of our volition.

If you are like me and you are truly mad as hell at the politicians in Washington for passing their problems to us, then you should join the masses that are standing up and speaking out. This does not mean that you need to join the Republican Party or even necessarily vote for Republicans. It does require that you hold public officials accountable for their actions and vote for the ones that have your best interests — not their burning political aspirations — at the forefront of their minds.

Earnest is a business junior.

Comments

29 comments
Ayatollah Mugsy
Fri Apr 17 2009 10:57
Inspired by the tea parties, I am organizing a series of grassroots Water-Bowl Parties for disgruntled and thirsty canines. I would hope the Daily Texan will cover these events and not ignore them, as the mainstream media have. Visit my blog at ayatollahmugsy.blogspot.com to learn more.
The Cowardly Liberal
Fri Apr 17 2009 10:48
Well said, UT History Alum! Frankly, I think the bit of suffering we're encountering will do us some good. Suffering builds character. (Why didn't the Bush Admin use this handy truism in order to justify torture?) We also get the government we deserve. Witness the public embarrassment that is Rick Perry. Finally, ignorance is bliss. I'm so happy, because I'm so stupid!
UT History Alum
Fri Apr 17 2009 10:02
The fact of the matter is that there is no way the financial mess we are in can be attributed to any one person, organization, or even decade of action or in-action. This whole mess has been brewing for pretty much longer than we have been alive. To continuously blame solely bush just shows ignorance. He is a large part of the cause, but then so is wall street, so is clinton, so is carter, so is the past and more recent republican congress/senate, so is the past and present democratic congress/senate.

Yes, O is trying to do something....but trying to do something that is wrong is not better than doing nothing however much you put your hands over your ears and shout that mantra. I do not think that we need to continue the "failed policies of the last 8 years" which has been shoved down our throats by the media and O. Everyone needs to take a step back and pick out the programs that worked from the past, and gradually try out new theories. The annoying situation we are in right now, politically, just has the republicans saying no we don't want to spend tax and borrow while the democrats are in a "we won" so we will just slam through immense spending and public works projects that have been shelved over time. It is just silly, and I see no end in sight to the circle.

As to the "stop whining about your taxes, thats the cost of civilization". Another general comment that shows total ignorance of the facts. Yes, taxes run our nation and it is the cost of civilization....(no source) but I'll say somewhere between 20%-45% of people do not pay taxes at all. Seems odd.

The Cowardly Liberal
Fri Apr 17 2009 09:40
Maybe if Earnest had been protesting the war back in 2003, he'd have a little more creditability as far as his "yes, but" criticisms of Bush go. The fact is that the Republican party, with a savage and single minded recklessness, has left us in the shambles where we now find ourselves. So if Earnest doesn't want to accept his share of the blame for this unconscionable travesty, maybe he should damn well step out of the way. There are good reasons why we don't hear anything from Michael "heckuva job, Brownie" Brown. He is (rightfully) hiding his head in shame. Meanwhile, stop whining about your taxes-- that's the cost of civilization. It ain't a free ride.
UT History Alum
Fri Apr 17 2009 08:28
I didn't see him blame the democrats or Obama for the "global economic crisis" but yes he did blame them for the current huge spending proposals....while also blaming Bush and the last 8 years of republicans for joining in the spending spree. I also didn't see him say that GWB was his hero. I guess you are projecting your inner feelins on Daniel (just as a guess as unlike you, I won't say that you said something when you did not).

Your comments (05:19 poster) are so closed minded and just utter nonsense. You didn't even read Daniel's article, you just threw out some basic liberal whining about how he supposedly blames dems and O for everything. Just read the article again, maybe you can learn something.

Red on the inside, red on the outside...
Fri Apr 17 2009 05:19
Earnest Daniel, why did you change your major?

Your major may have changed but it's still the same "ain't got the brain of a single flea," ideas that you spout. You didn't learn a single thing after another year at UT. You seem to be on track to becoming one of those perpetual students that we read about...

So you blame the Democrats and Obama for the global economic crisis and all the the terrorist spending proposals to correct the legacy of the Republican party and your hero George Bubba Smith? Ah, same old tactics, the blame game. Go back to playing with dolls at your young conservatives of texas tea parties....

Ralph
Fri Apr 17 2009 03:03
Right on! Only a narcissist can justify mortgaging the lives of future generations!
Your name
Fri Apr 17 2009 01:13
yea danny boy, please secede like you traitor Govenor Parry wants.
bob
John Doe
Fri Apr 17 2009 01:09
Daniel,
If McCain had become President you would be falling in lock step with his continuance of George W Bush's recless spending ways. Support big business to take from the average guy/girl. Barack Obama is actually doing something to get us out of the mess brought on by your President GWB. Its a know fact that you need to spend your way out of a recession. Who can better do that, but the government. Are you? I bet your just like the majority of other people out there and tightening up. Which directly/indirectly causes the issue we're seeing. It's a natural action to the situation we're in. When things turn around, the $12.5 trillion national debt by 2019 will not occur. You're basing that on the situation (revenue) staying the same till then. When things turn around, more income will occcur, lowering that projection.






log out