College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students

Partying like hell

By Daniel Earnest

Daily Texan Columnist

Print this article

Published: Friday, April 17, 2009

Updated: Friday, April 17, 2009

On Wednesday, in more than 300 locations and in every state in the Union, ordinary people assembled at city halls and state capitals to protest higher taxes and unrestrained government spending at TEA (“taxed enough already”) parties. At these gatherings, people held up signs saying that they were “mad as hell” and that they were “partying like it was 1774.”

When I first heard the idea, I wrote it off as something that was barely significant. But the more I learned about the protests, the keener I became on their idea and purpose. Most of the tea parties were not organized by a political party or by politicians but by normal citizens who mobilized their own communities.

In fact, Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele was respectfully turned down when he requested to be a part of the proceedings at the tea party in Chicago. The organizers of the event declined Steele’s request to speak by saying that “this is an opportunity for Americans to speak and elected officials to listen, not the other way around.”

In a time where politicians from both parties are attempting to be the heroic firemen who can extinguish the current economic blaze, this is the exact extinguisher that America needs. Americans need to gather together, regardless of party, color or religion and hold our elected officials accountable for the things that they do.

Also, for the Republican Party, the tea parties may serve as a highly effective wake-up call. Regardless of what CNN reporter Susan Roesgen said, the tea parties were not a part of the vast right-wing conspiracy or part of Fox News’s Republican agenda. Sure, conservatives definitely favor small government and low taxation, but a lot of people who value these things have been ostracized by the GOP in the last eight years.

Republicans have been just as guilty as Democrats in the recent past for increasing the size of government — and this is where Republicans have gone astray on their overall message. It is time that Republicans start touting their small- government principals, and I think that these initial tea parties (yes, there will be more) are just the catalyst that is needed to shake the dust off of the old, white-headed GOP.

But what does this mean for us as college students? While some youths attended the tea parties, the number of college students in attendance was not formidable enough to justify it being called a youth movement. Most of the protestors were middle-aged and older American citizens.

However, with the way things are going, there definitely should be overwhelming youth involvement in protesting the “pass the buck” economic policies of the Obama administration because, well, it directly affects every single one of us.

President Barack Obama promised during his campaign to not pass our current problems to future generations. But his eagerness to tax and spend since he has been in office suggests that this may have been just a part of the rest of his empty campaign rhetoric.

When he exited office, former President George W. Bush left a $5.8 trillion national debt. But if Obama were to serve eight years as president, The Heritage Foundation estimates that the national debt would increase to something along the lines of $12.5 trillion by 2019.

Now, even if you have faith that all the spending and taxing that Obama is doing is going to solve the current problem, it is worth noticing that his economic policies are also going to create new problems in terms of the aforementioned national debt. And, theoretically speaking, this gargantuan debt must be paid off by someone, someday.

Enter you — the college-aged American citizen who will be working for at least the next 35-40 years. It is us, our generation, who will foot this incredibly exorbitant bill.

So while college students remain relatively unaffected by the current economic crisis, we should begin thinking about our futures and the futures that our elected officials are paving for us, regardless of our volition.

If you are like me and you are truly mad as hell at the politicians in Washington for passing their problems to us, then you should join the masses that are standing up and speaking out. This does not mean that you need to join the Republican Party or even necessarily vote for Republicans. It does require that you hold public officials accountable for their actions and vote for the ones that have your best interests — not their burning political aspirations — at the forefront of their minds.

Earnest is a business junior.

Comments

29 comments
Caleb Dzul
Mon Apr 20 2009 13:10
In high school I was as far left as you could be; when I started college I considered joining the ISO. I went to a meeting and found out that it definitely wasn't for me, although they had an interesting perspective on things. Then I started doing research, was exposed to more ideas through my classes, learned about politics and HISTORY (an amazing eye opener) and then I really started listening to opposing viewpoints and being reflective. I think too many people just associate themselves with "liberal" or "conservative" because they are pressured into behaving a certain way based on who they grow up around or what their friends think. But when you get down to it and start looking at the issues at the micro level, that's when real differences arise that make people people, instead of just another liberal or conservative. I do not like when people intentionally, dismissively, and completely ignore the path that forming a well-informed political stance is when they start classifying people in black and white terms. One of the good things about college and writing is that you are forced to really reflect on things.

I can't take anybody seriously who is 100% anything on any issue. If they are, they haven't given enough thought to it.

Caleb Dzul
Mon Apr 20 2009 13:04
Don't be so sure about constructive dialogue not working. For instance, Jeff Shi got me to consider the other side's story of weapons, even though he's obviously very pro-gun, but I looked at his research and I'm not too proud to blind myself to facts. People's automatic instinct is to revert to what they already think they know, adhere to groupthink, and reinforce their beliefs as a defense mechanism. But if you appeal to their values and intellect you can sometimes break through.
Colin Harris
Mon Apr 20 2009 12:41
This arena is highly limited for constructive dialog, and while political discourse is highly entertaining for me, I don't put much credence in it's ability to change minds. I think life experiences generally do that more. My motivation is moreso to try and entertain, and my audience is very obviously the conservative minority.
Caleb Dzul
Mon Apr 20 2009 10:55
excuse me, it's early and my brain is fried...I meant "often" once. And writing to those that agree with you, not disagree...argh
Caleb Dzul
Mon Apr 20 2009 10:53
Daniel Earnest really isn't that bad you know. He started out very demagogic but he's far more balanced and his writing style is much better. I often disagree with what he says often, but I appreciate the effort he's put into bettering his writing.

Colin, from what I've read of your guest column(s)/comments, you're a very sarcastic writer, and that makes it difficult for anyone who disagrees with you to take your writing seriously. I'm sure you have a lot of good to say, and I appreciate the humor you bring, but sometimes it seems inappropriate. If you're interested in actual constructive dialogue with the columns you write, rather than causing people like the cowardly liberal to spam in flame wars and name calling, then you may wish to write in a less provocative manner and consider the opposition's point of view, rather than writing to those who disagree with you and pissing off those that don't.

Or, you can just write how you want and continue this pattern. It works for successful political talking heads, after all...unfortunately, it doesn't actually accomplish much other than anger .

Colin Harris
Sun Apr 19 2009 05:44
@The Cowardly Liberal

I'm planning to apply to be a columnist at the DT next semester. If you think Earnest is bad news, wait for me.

Scott Snyder
Sat Apr 18 2009 22:52
Of course college students don't see the problem in taxing the rich corporations to "help" the little guys. That is until they get a real job, usually for an overtaxed corporation, and start paying taxes themselves. It is mostly true that they are liberal until they grow up, then they get smart.
www.strategicbookpublishing.com/TheGH4Effect.html
Susie Q
Fri Apr 17 2009 17:28
Support big business to take from the average guy/girl???????????????????? YOU ARE AN IDIOT, JOHN DOE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Don't you know that when the government taxes the hell out of large corporations as a punishment, they pass the taxes down to YOU?!?!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!? Follow the logic of the process, aka, use your brain, and stop listening the the liberal rhetoric!! You just proved once again that liberals are stupid - thanks. :)
Susie Q
Fri Apr 17 2009 17:26
Support big business to take from the average guy/girl???????????????????? YOU ARE AN IDIOT, JOHN DOE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Don't you know that when the government taxes the hell out of large corporations as a punishment, they pass the taxes down to YOU?!?!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!? Follow the logic of the process, aka, use your brain, and stop listening the the liberal rhetoric!! You just proved once again that liberals are stupid - thanks. :)
Former Dem
Fri Apr 17 2009 17:22
BRAVO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WAKE UP, AMERICA!! Earnest is back!!
Grant
Fri Apr 17 2009 16:02
And the hits keep coming... no, really, we're dying for more.
The Cowardly Liberal
Fri Apr 17 2009 15:51
Do any of you remember the columnist Salil Puri? Known for consistently staking out positions somewhere to right of Dick Cheney? Just jaw droppingly offensive. But of course, this was a few years back, during the Bush administration, before any of you had come into political consciousness. At first I thought Puri's columns were a clever leftist attack, designed to highlight the inherent weakness of right wing "arguments." I briefly wondered if his name might be an anagram for puerile. But, no, he was the genuine article.

And then along came Daniel Earnest, without a doubt the most outrageously wretched scribbler to stain the Texan's pages in 16 years. (That's as far back as I go with DT, though I could tell you horror stories about a little paper called the Battalian.) I comfort myself with the knowledge that 'this, too, shall pass."

Grant
Fri Apr 17 2009 15:36
CL, glad to see you're sticking with the Daniel Earnest-related material. It really suits you!
The Cowardly Liberal
Fri Apr 17 2009 15:29
I'm sure Daniel Earnest was as much of prick at age 13 as you were, Colin. Have you developed a conscience yet toward anyone who is not a U.S. citizen? Or do you just shrug your shoulders and conclude that war is inevitable, kind of like bad weather and rape?
Colin Harris
Fri Apr 17 2009 15:20
Cowardly liberal,

Earnest was 13 in 2003, you dipsh*t. I don't want to discredit his education, but I doubt he was politically savvy then.

lady.texas
Fri Apr 17 2009 13:23
This article should be a wake up call for all aged people especially college students because the only job any of you will be able to get is a job with the government! This is a wake up call - so wake up and get informed. The title is ridiculous and shameful!
Avid Reader
Fri Apr 17 2009 11:40
*current/past Presidents
Avid Reader
Fri Apr 17 2009 11:39
Stephen, I think everyone on here was aware that we were talking about or referencing federal income taxes. I won't argue that the "bottom quintile that will spend their money to stimulate the economy" because again that is pretty basic knowledge that most will agree on and doesn't take an economist to understand.

And here we are again, boiling down the economic mess so much as to lay blame at the feet of one person or group. Everyone I listed earlier is responsible from the current/Presidents all the way down to the guy/girl who bought a tv he couldn't afford on credit. But thats cool Stephen, just continue on your closed minded path, that will get you far in life.

Take off your partisan glasses
Fri Apr 17 2009 11:34
Some of you need to wake up and realize that this isn't about republicans vs. democrats. This is about the people vs. Congress. Whether you are for Obama or against, the simple fact is that the trillions of dollars being used to stimulate the economy, whether it works or not, has to be paid off by someone at some point. Congress is the one pushing these spending bills through at an alarming rate and both the democrats and republicans in office are responsible.

You can't increase spending and decrease taxes. When the fed is responsible for both the printing and spending of our money, we are all in trouble. We will all be paying off this debt, whether it is through taxes or inflation.

Stephen
Fri Apr 17 2009 11:03
"20-45% of people pay no taxes at all"? Horse hockey -- especially here in Texas. What you mean is they pay no federal INCOME taxes and the range you gave shows you don't know what you're talking about. The Tax Foundation says about 33% of people will pay no federal income tax in 2009 before the refundable credit. Any economist worth his/her salt will tell you it is the bottom quintile that will spend their money to stimulate the economy which is why this tax "cut" is being provided to filers who aren't paying any taxes.

At least Obama proposed a full budget so you could see how much our government and its wars cost in one convenient, newsworthy number. The idiots in Congress didn't like that so they divvied it up. Obama has a plan that, IF we can get out of Iraq, could help get us back to balanced budgets. It is a faith-in-growth plan, but it worked for Clinton. Also, Obama continues to get no credit for pushing to keep the Social Security trust fund out of the budget. He couldn't get it through Congress, but he deserves some kudos for trying.







log out