College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students

Why I yell 'secede'

By Daniel Earnest

Daily Texan Columnist

Print this article

Published: Wednesday, September 16, 2009

Updated: Wednesday, September 16, 2009

Ever since Gov. Rick Perry fired up an anti-tax crowd (or swastika-carrying, tea-bagging group of nutjobs, depending on your political persuasion) in April, Texas secession has become a popular topic.

While I will admit to having bought a “secede” bumper sticker this summer, I can honestly say there was little to no significant conviction behind my purchase, as it never actually made it to my truck window. In reality, I simply enjoy yelling “secede” at parties or football games. You should try it — the response from people in close proximity is always interesting, particularly at parties.

But could Texas really make it on its own? The state’s detractors are quick to note that Texas ranks near the bottom in education and other important areas. But if you look at the statistics, Texas has been burgeoning in recent years, despite the rest of the country’s troubles.

For instance, if Texas were a country, it would theoretically have the 12th largest gross domestic product in the world, ahead of such countries as Russia, India and Mexico.

Furthermore, if Texas were a sovereign nation, it would be the fifth-largest oil producer in the world.

Texas’ economy also seems sturdy enough to stand alone, as its business-friendly policies have attracted more Fortune 500 companies to Texas than any other state. Texas has also been the United States’ No. 1 exporting state for six years running, 1.2 million jobs have been created in the last five years and, in the last year, half of all the jobs created in the U.S. came from Texas.

We all know about Texas’ size. The state extends across 267,339 square miles, or 7.4 percent, of the nation’s total area — which would make Texas the 10th-largest country in the world. I mean, come on, the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport is bigger than Manhattan. In addition to encompassing a massive stretch of land, Texas has the largest population growth rate of any state in America. One thousand people per day are added to our population, and that number is rapidly increasing.

Why all the growth? Texas has a low cost of living, a relatively stable housing market and sound tax policies. For instance, there is no state income tax, nor is there a tax on goods in transit — perhaps contributing to Texas’ ranking as the No. 1 state in which to do business, according to CNBC.

Add this to the fact that Amarillo has the largest helium well in the world, Laredo is the world’s largest inland port and South Texas’ King Ranch is larger than the state of Rhode Island, and you have a compelling argument that Texas is not only the most self-sufficient state in the country, but could also be better off without the United States.

Sure, you could probably rattle off statistics that prove the likely failure of Texas’ secession, but if nothing else, the facts outlined here can serve as a reminder to everyone of Texas’ superiority to every other state.

But like I said earlier, there is absolutely no sincerity behind my cries to secede — Perry and I are similar in this manner.

I’m just the type of person who takes pleasure in talking about the theoretical prospect of secession. After all, I love “Amurica” way too much to actually ever want to be disjoined from the greatest country in the world.

Despite this, I guarantee I am the maniac you will see carrying the “secede” poster this weekend at the Texas Tech game.

Hey, who knows? Maybe Kirk Herbstreit and Brent Musburger will notice me. 

Earnest is a finance junior.

Comments

23 comments
S
Mon Oct 26 2009 13:29
So...are you going to back up your claims of socialism and precedents for secession with some solid examples or facts? Or are you going to just "LOL" and pretend you know something? Geez, you conservatives are such good pet parrots.

Taking a leaf from your book, I'd like to say that I have no time to argue with you either. As Barney Frank said, talking to you is like talking to a dining room table. Oh well, guess I have to get back to work now (and miraculously, between my job and life, I somehow manage to find time to follow the news and pay attention in history, which can't possibly be any more strenuous than "following GB," whatever the hell that is).

Amertex
Thu Oct 15 2009 17:29
LOL! I don't follow GB! Nor am I in the mood to get into a political argument with you. I am too busy working trying to keep my head above water so I will not be forced to ask for handout or hang out in a food line!
Sarcasm would probably work better, but here goes a serious attempt
Sat Oct 3 2009 14:04
As a previous poster has said, you ARE being represented - by the people you voted into Congress. You're not being taxed without representation, and iirc, you've been paying the standard ~15% individual and ~15% payroll tax for more than a decade now. Furthermore, no one's raised your taxes yet - and preempting such an action by secession is just stupid. Preemptive action didn't work for the Cold War era (Truman doctrine, Kennedy doctrine, and Johnson doctrine), it didn't work for the Vietnam war (Nixon doctrine), and it sure as hell isn't working out for us in the Iraq War (Bush doctrine). You're stirring up civil unrest without due cause.

You don't like Obama bailout plan - well, hardly anyone does. However, I would rather he do something which MIGHT help the nation, than to do nothing at all which will DEFINITELY NOT help anyone. TARP (that would be the bailout plan, for all of you that don't know) WORKED. It might be unpopular, but it worked. It stabilized the banking system, which possibly prevented another Great Depression. The Great Depression started with Black Tuesday, but it was jumpstarted by a series of failing banks, which is what we had in 2008. Unlike the Great Depression, however, Obama didn't go on a series of fishing trips and "let the economy fix itself" like President Hoover did. If Obama had done nothing, the economy would have continued sliding, and instead of calling it taxation without representation, you would be simply calling him a failure.

Also, TARP cost $700 billion, and you're getting your panties into a bunch. BUSH's Iraq and Afghanistan wars combined are set to break the trillion dollar mark this year, and the war hawks are going to ask for another 200 billion this year. That breaks down to 20 million dollars an hour, 365 days a year, and about $7000 per person. Where were you and your Bible and your calls for secession when Bush set us down this costly path? Your attitudes remind me of that Timbuk song, Prey - "You never pray for peace, you pray for victory. You never pray for love, you pray for abstinence. You pray for the godless ones, the ones who will not pray. Your pray for a savior who will blow them all away."

AMERTEX, socialism my ass. Better get off the roads then, cuz that was paid for by socialism. Hell, get out of UT, cuz that was partly paid for by socialism too. In fact, if you have any elderly relatives, better get them off Medicare, because that's exactly what our "socialist healthcare reform" is trying to imitate. Sharing 100% is socialism. Sharing 5% is not. Instead of crying "socialism," can you back it up with specific facts, other than "cuz Glenn Beck told me so?" And FYI, "socialism" in the USSR is "Socialism" with a capital S. Perhaps you would like to wiki the difference? China is supposed to be "communist," also sharing 100%, but lo and behold, they have a capitalist economy.

From what COMMENTS I see here, the main arguments here for secession are "taxation without representation" and "socialism." You ARE being represented, you're going to pay taxes for something you don't like no matter what civilized nation you live in, and half of you don't even know the denotation (versus the connotation) of "socialism."

Rhett Butler
Mon Sep 28 2009 14:59
The Yankees' ll kick your butt. And, don' t say I did not warn y'all.
Phil
Thu Sep 24 2009 15:33
www.TexasNationalist.Com

YES WE CAN SECEDE!

Jefferson
Tue Sep 22 2009 13:13
To the posters who claim taxation without representation, do you not know who your Representatives and Senators are in Congress? If you don't like them, vote them out or contact them to tell them your idea of how we can change (or eliminate) government policies to make things better. As for other similarities with 1776, in 1776 the British used to conscript (kidnap) people into the navy and would station troops in people's houses. I don't think our situation is at all the same today.
AMERTEX
Mon Sep 21 2009 16:54
To JG---Hi There I am a fellow Texan as well as an American. I really can't see where seceding is a bad thing nor is it treason. We all need to get real...This is not the same America anymore. Our Great Nation is being dismantled as we speak by the socialist democratic powers. The United States was never meant to be a socialist country...Look at what happened to the former Soviet Union.

Socialism did not work for them..Nor will it for the United States.

GOD BLESS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA! We all need to pray for our wonderful nation...She really needs our prayers!

Come and Take It!
Sun Sep 20 2009 17:31
Texan first, American second! If Texas secedes, I will be right there with my Bible and my gun. Just give us Texas, and you Scallywags can keep your Change. BTW its not treason, its in the American Constitution, same as it was last time...
blackelkspeaks
Sat Sep 19 2009 23:51
Texas isn't the only state in this country that is full of people who want to secede from Hussein's Obamanation. I expect that, if Texas takes this seriously, other states throughout the country would follow. Texans wouldn't have to fight alone. I personally know many, many people who would are ready to leave their blue states behind and go somewhere, anywhere, in the red state enclaves to begin the next American revolution. "If at first you don't secede, try, try again." And that's no joke!
silent majority
Sat Sep 19 2009 23:24
There are 2 ways for Texas to secede -- peacefully and by armed rebellion. Texas is one of the very few bright spots in the U.S. economy and has natural resources needed by the U.S. The U.S. will not simply allow Texas to secede peacefully without an extremely large 'divorce settlement' payment. The remaining states will not allow Texas to walk away from the U.S. national debt and to confiscate all U.S. facilities, e.g. U.S. military bases. Seceding by force-of-arms is the alternative to seceding peacefully. Texas has already tried to secede by force. The result would be the same and for the same reason. The Union States collectively had (still has) superior military resources. Texas does not have sufficient military strength to prevail against the remaining 49 states. Another big problem is Scalawags and Carpetbaggers vastly outnumber the native Sons of Texas.
grumpygresh
Sat Sep 19 2009 21:23
Ultimately, succession is a political question. The US constitution has been violated for years and the most recent transgressions have been egregious. If the the living breathing Constitution has morphed into something less valuable than toilet paper, why should Texans follow some obscure nullification of Texas' unique succession right? Cass Sunstein (regulatory czar) has essentially said that the President can supersede US Supreme Court rulings. Now is he following the US Constitution?
Time for a plebiscite!
Your name
Sat Sep 19 2009 00:07
"My right [to secede] is locked up in my gun safe...right beside my Bible." Wow!! I want some of _Serious_as_a_Heart_attack_'s hallucinogen; it is obviously good stuff. I wonder how many aircraft carrier battle groups _Serious_ thinks he sees stashed away in his gun safe.
Serious as a Heart attack
Fri Sep 18 2009 18:27
I like how people always say that Texas doesn't have the right to secede. Do you think that will actually stop us? America didn't have the "right" to form a new country either but look where we are.

My "right" is locked up in my gun safe...right beside my Bible.

Reconstructionist History
Wed Sep 16 2009 17:57
As Mrs. Pennypacker notes:

Reconstruction Convention.— The Governor called for an election of a convention that should reconstruct the state government. No one was permitted to vote at this election except those taking an oath prescribed by the President. The convention met, February, 1866, at Austin. It declared " secession a nullity," and gave up all rights to such action; all debts made for the carrying on of the war or for the support of the Confederacy were made invalid; all the proceedings of the Convention of 1861 were rendered null and void. The Constitution in force before the war was again put into effect. An election for state officers was held the last Monday in June, 1866. J. W. Throckmorton was chosen governor, and George W. Jones lieutenant-governor.

Even if Texas had the right to secede at one time, it gave up that right in 1866.

H|E>=E|E>
Wed Sep 16 2009 14:11
Few things are more humorous than an authentic cry for secession, particularly when they're propped up with broad generalizations and stereotypes (cf. "Rick was serious too"). Indulge me, O ye great thinkers of tomorrow!
silent majority
Wed Sep 16 2009 14:05
"Could Texas really make it on its own?" is an interesting but pointless mental gymnastic. Texas ain't goin' no where, Bubba. Texas' so-called "Right to Secede" is a myth, like the postcard "Jackalope" (jackrabbit with antlers). Texas approved annexation to the U.S. without a right to peacefully secede from the U.S. in whole or in part. See "Ordinance of the Convention of Texas, July 4, 1845".
Roommate
Wed Sep 16 2009 13:14
SECEDE!!!
The Cowardly Liberal Cowpoke
Wed Sep 16 2009 11:08
Folks, brother Daniel was just horsin' around. He done admitted he don't mean nothin' by it. Let's all just sit a spell with some sippin' whiskey and look at a little TV. Maybe Matthew Dillon'll come on. Boy, ol' Festus sure 'nuff is a caution! Phew!
Rick was serious too
Wed Sep 16 2009 10:31
JG - I guess the Amercian revolution was treason also, so what's your point? I recommend you watch the first three episodes of the made-for-TV series "John Adams". The similarities between what was happening in the colonies then and what is happening to Texans now is striking.
Rick was serious too
Wed Sep 16 2009 10:27
Daniel - I am disappointed that your cries for secession are not serious. You of all people should know that the real issue re: secession, like our forefathers before us, is that Texas is now in the position of being taxed without representation. The values and priorities of the vast majority of Texans are not reflected in the current political system. We are supporting the rest of the country with our taxes, jobs and natural resources, while the liberal politicians from the east and west coasts squander our money on socialist-leaning policies that most Texans do not support. So I yell "Secede" along with you, but I'm dead serious. This country does not stand for my values or priorities any more. It's time to move on and exercise our rights to withdraw ffrom the union that no longer serves the people of Texas. We came in as a sovereign nation and we can go out the same way.






log out