College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students

Viewpoint: Lessons from Dan Rather

By Jeremy Burchard

The Daily Texan Editorial Board

Print this article

Published: Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Updated: Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Students will have a unique opportunity to hear from one the most notable journalists of the past 30 years this Thursday. Dan Rather, the Emmy-winning former anchor of the “CBS Evening News,” will deliver a free lecture, “The Future of News: The Crisis in American Journalism and Why People Should Care,” at the Texas Union Ballroom on Thursday at 4 p.m.

As a network television journalist, Rather was the first to break news of the Kennedy assassination and provide in-depth coverage of the Watergate scandal and Nixon impeachment. As a correspondent for “60 Minutes” and the successor to beloved Texas journalist Walter Cronkite on the “Evening News,” Rather won numerous Peabody awards for his news coverage and special reports on topics such as the abuse at Abu Ghraib prison. Clearly, Rather is one of the most qualified figures in American journalism today.

But criticism followed Rather throughout his career. Although he retained the strong viewership Cronkite pulled at CBS, the popularity of the “Evening News” fluctuated during his tenure as managing editor and anchor. While Rather plans to speak on the crisis of journalism in America, he was criticized by Peter Boyer of The New York Times for doing little to stop severe news staff layoffs in 1984. He has also been accused of having a double standard in his story selection, leaning toward coverage of more “liberal” issues, though he was among the first to point out a similar conservative bias on Fox News Channel, which he argued received talking points from the Bush administration and portrayed them as “news.”

Rather may be famous for his hard-nosed interviews of world leaders and his low-pitched Texas drawl, but he’ll be infamous for the 2004 Killian documents controversy, during which he was castigated for reporting a story on George W. Bush’s Air National Guard service record after consulting what most experts consider inauthentic documents. CBS defended itself by claiming it was misled by the provider of the documents, and Rather was quoted on “Larry King Live” in 2007 saying, “Nobody has proved that they were fraudulent, much less a forgery.” The fallout from the story led to several management changes at CBS and most likely hastened Rather’s retirement in 2005. Rather later unsuccessfully tried to sue CBS for making him a scapegoat in the aftermath of the story.

But despite the rocky ending of Rather’s CBS career, he is considered one of the most influential figures in journalism. Rather has accused journalists of softness in the covering news and missing the true story — what many journalists need, he has said, is a “spine transplant.”

Few journalists have walked the walk like Rather, who has long spoken out for courageous and critical reporting. It may be that drive that led him and the “CBS Evening News” to go ahead with the Killian documents story. But Rather’s historic and decorated background proves his style has ultimately benefited American journalism. He has experienced the gifts of a judicious mind and the consequences of brash action. His background, with its triumphs and criticisms, is a reminder of why it is important to be strong-headed and thorough in reporting, and his speech is sure to remind us why journalism matters.

 

Comments

5 comments
No hero
Wed Oct 21 2009 20:29
James, I post contrary to the author's opinion (see "No hero" below). The Daily Texan, although liberal in its editorial point of view, does not delete opinions based on content. I trust that your post was not "spam" and was not patently offensive. May I suggest you repost your opinion regarding Dan Rather.
James
Wed Oct 21 2009 18:45
Why, when I make a post making a fool of the person who wrote the article about Dan Rather, it suddenly disappears? Typical liberal tactics. Print the lie, run from the truth.
ROBERT P KELSO SR
Wed Oct 21 2009 16:00
It is evidence of the anti-U,S., manipulative power of Dan Rather that Ms. Treviño has been taken in. Mr. Rather could not back up his slander of W. under the conditions of a law court – not the of ten mistaken, ‘court of public opinion’ -- to show proof. Rather’s continued serial and futile pursuits of the point is indicative of his egotistical hubris. He and Walter Cronkite headed the country toward destruction by their influence on the nation and upon the democrat congress that cut off funding for the Vietnam War, a war which we were winnin and in which the U.S. never lost a battle. A war in which the North Vietnamese generals later admitted they were losing. Rather’s and Cronkite’s agenda was to continue to work against the best interest of the country -- an agenda not interrupted until the appearance of the competitive and patriotic philosophy of Rush Limbaugh.
No hero
Wed Oct 21 2009 15:28
Rather was so passionately anti-Bush that he screwed-up big-time. Hatcheting Bush shortly before the election was so important to Rather that he did the biggest journalism no-no. Rather used documents that had not been properly source checked. Rather lost job at CBS and his case against CBS for good reason.
Martha E. Treviño
Wed Oct 21 2009 09:43
it's so utterly sad to lose a great journalist as Mr. Dan Rather simply because he had the courage to report what others were simply too scared to share with the American public. In a country famous for freedom of speech, injustices like what occurred to him are really quite a shame. I always admired and respected Mr. Dan Rather because this great country of ours needs more heroes like him.






log out