College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students

‘Democracy Now!’ co-host examines future of media

By Molly Triece

Daily Texan Staff

Print this article

Published: Friday, April 3, 2009

Updated: Friday, April 3, 2009

Juan Gonzalez

Jacqueline Gilles/The Daily Texan

Juan Gonzalez, co-host of Democracy Now!, spoke in the Texas Student Union on Thursday afternoon about President Barack Obama and the future of the media. He emphasized six main points, including the importance of nurturing local news and low-cost broadband, and encouraged listeners to become involved in the media environment to effect change.

Juan Gonzalez, a columnist for the New York Daily News and co-host of radio and television program “Democracy Now!,” addressed the future of the news media under the Obama administration at UT on Thursday.

Gonzalez, who advises minority news organizations through his involvement in groups such as the National Association of Hispanic Journalists, analyzed the current state of the mainstream media.

“We’ve constructed a media system that has many problems in it, but not a system that can’t be changed,” Gonzalez said.

Gonzalez said the key journalistic issues that will evolve during Obama’s presidency are the spread of low-cost broadband, privacy protection on the Internet and the role of the government in the production of local news.

“Generally, we are told that ours is a privately owned market-based system,” Gonzalez said. “In reality, there has been enormous involvement of government in the erection of our media system.”

Gonzalez said the Founding Fathers first influenced information dissemination in America with the creation of the postal service and later the subsidization of newspaper subscriptions. Every time a new circulation method is produced, the government decides how to organize it, he said.

“Technology knows no religion,” Gonzalez said, “It keeps moving forward, and every time it does, it destabilizes the system.”

He said the Internet adds complications to an already flawed method of news reporting.

“The problem isn’t censorship,” Gonzalez said. “The problem is we are deluged with information.”

Gonzalez said white-dominated newsrooms and a lack of minority-owned radio and television stations and newspapers have led to an underrepresentation of minorities in America.

“Who owns a station racially has a lot of impact on what they decide to cover,” Gonzalez said.

The media market is also trying to balance local news with an increasing amount of centralized news that can leave viewers misinformed on issues in their immediate communities, he said.

Journalism freshman Emily Sides agreed with Gonzalez’s analysis but said he left out some important issues.

Gonzalez emphasized the lack of reporting on racial minorities by white-owned media organizations but did not mention how much airtime was devoted to coverage of lower classes, she said.

Plan II and journalism freshman Danielle Cross similarly said she saw eye-to-eye with Gonzalez but wanted to hear more about underrepresented economic groups.“There’s a lot more diversity than just race,” Cross said.

Comments

13 comments
W. Rodriguez
Thu Apr 16 2009 19:31
I remember a time growing up in the Bronx when the majority of Puerto Ricans read "El Diario La Prensa" or "El Vocero". These papers covered issues that impacted Hispanics throughout the city of New York, as well as Latin America, and the Caribbean. I recall seeing images of human suffrage in all forms. The stories weren't "fluffed" to suit the perceived frailness of their subscribers. When my father spoke of the politics surrounding New York City, he didn't make it a point to align himself with one party, at the expense of the masses. No, twenty five years or so ago, NYC's Hispanic papers printed the truth...party be damned! You see, back then, they understood that unfair is unfair, and it mattered not who was in the White House, or in Gracie Mansion. It mattered not if the tyrant was a Democrat or a Republican for the results of tyranny is always identical. These papers had an almost exclusive following from the Hispanic community as they were printed in Spanish. Perhaps Mr. Gonzalez should have sought employment with these papers and changed them from within. That is, he could have started introducing columns in English to grow the younger generation, and pursue the publishers to expand coverage in both languages without compromising the character and "feel" of the paper. A move such as this would have preserved and empowered the lives of Latinos while addressing the issues that are most important to the Hispanic community.
Your name
Tue Apr 14 2009 00:53
THE NEWSPAPERS ALL ACROSS AMERICA ARE LEFT WING COMMUNIST RADICALS.
THE T.V. NEWS SHOWS ALL ACROSS AMERICA ARE LEFT WING COMMUNIST RADICALS..
MOST ALL NEWS MAGAZINES ARE LEFT WING COMMUNIST RADICALS.
THE ONLY MEDIA THE CONSERVATIVES HAVE ARE A HAND FULL OF RADIO TALK SHOWS AND FOX NEWS.

SO TELL ME PLEASE, WHY NOW THAT THE LEFT WING OWNS ALL THE MEDIA DO YOU STILL WANT
TO BLAME EVERYTHING ON THE WHITES????????????????
YOU ARE KEPT SO DUMBED DOWN FIRST BY NO EDUCATION IN THE GOVT SCHOOLS AND SECOND
BY THE LEFT WING MEDIA.
YOU HAVE ALL THE MEDIA NOW, SO WHAT MORE DO YOU WANT?
YOU KNOW THE LEFT WING IS HIDING EVERYTING FROM YOU SO WHY DON'T YOU ADMIT IT"

JW Salthouse
Mon Apr 13 2009 23:18
The problem IS Censorship but the fake "left" media denies the reality of it. Utube and others admit to and have been proven to censor massively popular videos, etc.. by eliminating or altering view numbers and blocking certain people that they chose to keep out of the conversation. I USED listen to Democracy Now! for years but took the red pill and discovered that Democracy Now censors by not covering certain topics. Lying and censorship is often just as much what is NOT said than what IS said. Democracy Now hosts are experts at censorship so much of what they say must be viewed with skepticism! PS Obama's handlers want to destroy Internet freedom . Internet 2 will be brought out under the guise of some cyber-terrorist protection.
D-Doc
Mon Apr 13 2009 20:34
Sounds like bitter grapes "nwner". the media did everything they could to keep Mr Obama out of the white house. if you saw it differently, you must have been watching with a SERIOUS bias! want the truth from the news? go to democracynow.org or GRITtv.org (there are other's but those are the best two). if news were REALLY fair and balanced would any of this be a questioni? I long for the days when serious looking individuals sat on tv and gave us facts...no opinion, no so called experts to "break down" what we just heard, just the facts! That's long gone and those of us who care need to stop watching the BS all together until they bring back real news.
Yoli
Wed Apr 8 2009 16:52
I think something important included in Gonzalez's speech is the true ownership of broadcast media and other outlets. Frequently, identification of major corporations most of whom are multinational have a great deal of input from implementing mandates on what broadcasters should cover. Trained journalists are often not free to determine what they even allowed to investigate let alone report. The issues of diversity are important; however, truth-telling and broad perspectives that are not subject to the service of either government or big business are probably more important. They are many communications law texts from the '80s that sought to protect the encroachment of technology on the rights and freedoms of individuals. Consistently in this century, I hear that not only has technology outrun the law but also the ability to reflect ethically on its development and implementation. In my opinion, the challenge to freedom and true democracy are rapidly eroding under the implementation of technologies with proper ethical regulation and understanding of the intended and unintended consequences.
Matt
Tue Apr 7 2009 18:41
Obama is a public attention toy just like every other president has been for the last century or more. Americans do not vote for who runs the country. It's run by the financial big-wigs that put us in debt and rob us of our freedoms under a veil of secrecy. And it's these same people that run our media, to blind us from their intentions.
nellyb123
Mon Apr 6 2009 17:30
Media, good journalism, Pulitzer Prize winning articles are a thing of the past, or we have to search for them on the internet; this is due to conglomeration of the newspaper media business. The people have a right to be informed. As Thomas Jefferson said, If given the choice I would rather have newspapers and no government than a government without newspapers.
rodney
Sun Apr 5 2009 10:18
i am black, and i don't believe white supremacy is a problem unless i make it a problem. it's ridiculous to keep kicking the dead horse on that issue. those kinds of issues are exactly what the banking cartels want us to be arguing over constantly to keep them in the shadows.
Fuzzypuddles
Sat Apr 4 2009 22:18
I agree with eman. The creation of newspapers with a focus on races and classes other then the white middle class would provide stories focusing on different events or different aspects of events as it pertains to its target audience, and so could potentially provide a large amount of information not given by other news sources. Audience has always been a very important consideration for newspapers, and will continue to be as long as the news is a business, especially today in America with local newspapers going out of business en masse. I feel Audience is also the reason the Mainstream Media in America today is both lacking appropriate coverage of important world events (i.e. Israel-Palestine) or is providing biased coverage of what it does show its audience (which seems to be the white middle class). So perhaps the issue is not so much white supremacy as white targeting?
Kay Aubrey-Chimene
Sat Apr 4 2009 12:27
I don't believe that the mainstream newspapers jumped on the Obama bandwagon until the decision was already made. Here in heavily hispanic So. Arizona it is still rare to see articles that reflect the day to day life realities of the hispanic population. I am not hispanic, but am extremely aware of the broad coverage given to those who resent and demonize all hispanics as "Illegal" yet little coverage is given to those who support diversity of culture. We see advertising for large Mariachi concerts backed by big names such as Linda Ronstadt - but no coverage of the day to day goings on for a large percentage of our population.

Outsiders reading or hearing the Tucson media would believe Tucson to be primarily white, middle class. This is just not true.

sunx
Sat Apr 4 2009 09:46
White Supremacy is still alive and doing well in america, unlike what most people (especially white) would like to believe. America likes to bomb brown people far away, and lock em at home.
eman
Sat Apr 4 2009 09:24
the news papers did not put Obama in office. The people and 8 years of bush did that. Lets not forget the white owned media in the past and present still have problems in reporting on the issues of systemic racism. A news organization started on the basis of race is not a bad idea. different point of views are needed for balance. To simply ignore race is exactly what Att. Gen. Eric Holder was talking about when he said "americans are a bunch of cowards when it comes to racism." It's time to admit, accept, even embrace the fact that blacks, whites, hispanics, asians, Native americans, and people of middle eastern dissent are in some way different.
nwner
Fri Apr 3 2009 21:28
Isn't it a bit silly to be whining about white owned newspapers not covering news the way minority groups might like when those same papers gave whole hearted support to a minority candidate and basically put him into office? When you start a news organization on the basis of race, what do you think will be the product?






log out