For those of you unable to attend this morning’s TSM board meeting (and who can’t wait for tomorrow’s news story), my take on the situation is that there is agreement that there was a breakdown in communication about the performance of Gary Borders as TSM director between the University administration and the board (and not much agreement on anything else.) Gary Borders is still out as TSM director. At this time, there are no plans to sell the licenses for TSTV and KVRX. There may be future discussions about exploring the possibility of shifting responsibility for TSM from the Division of Student Affairs to the College of Communications. A search is on for an interim director, who should be selected at a special board meeting on March 7. The interim director will run things while the search is on for a new, permanent director, if such a thing exists. No word on when the search for a digital adviser might begin. Another board meeting is set for March 19, the last possible minute to set a TSM budget for the coming year. I think that’s pretty much it. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Sometimes you just have to wonder what's going on in the minds of politicians. Watching the Republican debate last night, you saw four white guys in suits all trying to out right-wing the other as they kowtowed to a room full of neanderthal nutjobs from Arizona. Oh, and Gov. Rick Perry was there, too, sitting right next to Callista Gingrich's hairdo!
Anyway, we have our own problems right here on the Forty Acres. If you've been reading the Texan this week here online or in print (as I'm sure you have), not one, but two pairs of candidates for the top posts in Student Government have been disqualified for campaign violations. You can see the stories here and here.
What's up with these people. Do they not know the rules or do they just decide not to play by them? I guess it's a little of both. Frankly, it's embarrassing.
But we aren't the only ones with election woes. Check out the problems their having at the University of Florida here. Go Gators!
It's been way too long since my last blog entry. There's not excuse except the daily press of duties, and that will no longer be accepted. I vow to keep this puppy up to date. We'll see how that plays out.
For those of you who might have missed it, there has been a lot going on in the pages of The Daily Texan this semester! We've been covering the resignation of TSM Director Gary Borders, the scandal-plagued SG election and the fortunes of various Longhorn athletic teams. We even had an incident in which a lot of Daily Texans were stolen from their news boxes. What's up with that? If you know, drop up a line.
I urge you all to follow our efforts in the paper and at dailytexanonline.com.
In the meantime, here's a link to Dan Kennedy's MediaNation blog that carries a speech by Marty Baron, my former boss at The Boston Globe, who offers a solid rationale for why what journalists do continues to matter. I urge you to take a look and think about what he has to say.
I guess the guy was right when he said, "Don't mess with Texas."
But who knew he was talking about members of the Longhorns football team?
By far the most controversial story the Texan has published so far this semester is a rather light-hearted Page One piece about No. 7 jerseys being marked down at the University Co-op after Garrett Gilbert and Nolan Brewster -- the two players to wear the number this season -- were sidelined with injuries.
The story, which was lacking a byline because of a production error, was written by Sports editor Trey Scott and simply quoted Co-op president George H. Mitchell explaining why the jerseys were being offered at 50 percent off.
It also quoted a student who said he wouldn't buy the jersey, even with the discount. The story also notes that Gilbert has taken a fair amount of public criticism for the Horns lackluster season in 2010 and that sales of No. 7 jerseys have been down since then. No new ones were ordered this year.
That's about it, folks, but the public reaction has been quite remarkable, with at least four angry "Firing Line" letters to editor published on the Texan's Opinion page, so far. The writers are uniform in criticizing the Texan for taking cheap shots at Gilbert, an unfair scapegoat.
Here's what Scott, the Texan Sports editor has to say:
"I understand that, after all of what Garrett's been through, people are quick to attack anybody who says anything negative about him for the sake of the kid. The point of the article, however, was that the Co-op was in a spot it has never been before, that it has to mark down jerseys that it didn't even sell last year. There are 1,000 No. 7s waiting to be sold.
"The president of the Co-op was sad to have to put the jerseys on sale, because he feels like Garrett has taken almost all of the blame for last year's 5-7 season. But he had to do it [mark them down] because it's a business, just like Mack Brown and the co-offensive coordinators benched Gilbert for the sake of the team — that's business as well."
I say -- get a life, people! The Texan didn't mark down the jerseys. The Co-op and Nike, the manufacturer did. The Texan noted that this is the first time this step has been taken. That's news -- and that's what we're in the business of reporting.
I would ask where the angry letters are about the Texan story detailing the lawsuit filed by a national fraternity organization against a renegade local chapter that alleged that exotic dancers were hired as part of an initiation ritual. Is that standard operating procedure around the Forty Acres? Is any kind of deviant behavior acceptable as long as -- god forbid -- it doesn't have a bit of harmless fun with the hallowed football program?
The football program that has won exactly one national championship since 1970?
Garrett Gilbert isn't to blame for that long drought and the Texan shouldn't be blamed for simply reporting the facts.
I try to share what I think are interesting developments in the media biz with you, my loyal readers.
Of course, I assume that you all go to the Romenesko site every day for all the latest news. And some of you know things before I do, BUT, I wanted to urge you to take a look at the new site launched by my old friends and colleagues at The Boston Globe.
It’s called bostonglobe.com, not to be confused with boston.com, the Globe’s site since 1995. The new site will have all of the Globe’s content, the old one won’t. The new site will have Web-only content that enhances Globe stories, the old one won’t. Both will have all the sports coverage of Boston teams, I believe.
The big difference is that, starting Oct. 1, access to the new site will cost you $4 a week (well, $3.99). It’s “free” if you happen to have a subscription of any kind to the print product.
If you have a minute, take a look around the new site and decide if you’d pay $200 a year to access it. The Globe, like every other media company around (including Texas Student Media, mothership of The Daily Texan), is trying to find ways to make more money on what it has to offer – information you won’t find anywhere else.
Will this work? Only time will tell. But I applaud the cutting-edge effort that went in to creating the new site. Media companies have to try everything in order to survive. Let me know what you think.