• Police Lives Matter undermines efforts to increase police accountability by Black Lives Matter

    Opposite sides of the spectrum of the discussion on police brutality were represented by two rallies held in downtown Austin on Sept. 19 — Police Lives Matter and Black Lives Matter. In order to understand the clashing of these two affiliations, one must know what they stand for. Black Lives Matter is a community-driven movement created to battle anti-black racism, as well as peacefully revolt against the disproportionate amount of police violence toward blacks. Police Lives Matter is a movement created to “highlight all the good that goes into protecting and serving,” but is rooted in complacency and undermines black activists.

    BLM gained traction following the shooting death of unarmed Michael Brown by white police officer Darren Wilson. Since then, protests have erupted across the country following police killings of other unarmed black people, including Eric Garner, Tamir Rice, Larry Jackson Jr., John Crawford and Freddie Gray.

    Fundamentally, BLM intends to hold police accountable for mistreating black people, along with battling other forms of anti-black racism.The Washington Post’s interactive database tracking police killings by gunfire, which the FBI admitted to improperly counting, is crucial accountability that exists because of BLM and other awareness initiatives.

    Furthermore, BLM’s grievances are not without statistical reinforcement. Black men are seven times more likely to be shot dead by police while unarmed than white men. As of 2013, 90 percent of those stopped-and-frisked by the NYPD were black or Hispanic, with 11.1 percent resulting in an arrest. Prison sentences for black men were 20 percent longer than white men with similar crimes. This blatant racial discrimination in the police and justice systems is what BLM wants to end.

    These statistics are only a small part of why “black lives matter” is a phrase every American needs to hear.

    The PLM Facebook page states “Police Lives Matter because All Lives Matter.” Much of the page’s dialogue operates around police safety and the debunked “War on Cops,” although felonious deaths of officers has been the lowest in decades. Simultaneously, police are killing civilians at outrageous speeds, and at a staggeringly higher rate than other developed countries. The page makes no attempt to acknowledge the police’s discriminatory track record.

    Movements like PLM, phrased identically to BLM as a means of contradiction, cloud the accountability black activists have worked to advance. When there is irrefutable documentation of harassment and violence against the black people officers are sworn in to protect, blind praise is the antithesis of a solution.

    BLM asking for their verifiable concerns to be acknowledged, as well as humanity, should not be controversial.

    Supporting police without criticising their oppression of black people proves what BLM has been saying from the beginning: Too many do not care about black lives. This isn’t the first time a group has attempted to disenfranchise black civil rights movements. To support BLM is to be on the right side of history.

    Hamze is an international relations and global studies junior from Austin. He is an Associate Editor. Follow Hamze on Twitter @adamhamz.

  • University needs to offer continuous support to transfer students

    Regardless how smooth a student’s transition is from high school to college, it is almost always terrifying. The apprehension associated with being thrown into a new environment is quelled by the fact that so many other students are engaging in the same experience. For transfer students, it is a different story. Transfer students face a new set of hardships, with scarce resources to ease the journey. The University, as well as Student Government, need to continue to find new, innovative ways to help these students feel comfortable at UT.

    From 2010–2014, there have been approximately 2,500 undergraduate transfer students admitted to the University per year. They are thrown into a pool of over 50,000 students, the majority of whom had the opportunity to go through orientation, involvement fair and other University entry-level programs with other incoming freshman. Often, incoming freshmen establish their friend groups and communities within their first year of college, making it difficult for transfer students to find their niche.

    The University offers certain programs, such as Longhorn Welcome Week, in order to give transfer students an opportunity to meet one another. But that isn’t enough. Transfer students should have specific resources throughout their first semesters to ask questions, meet new people and feel at home. There is currently only one organization on campus dedicated to this work, called Texas Transfer Students.

    Created over the summer by and for transfer students, Texas Transfer Students aims to establish weekly social events as well as academic advising, specifically for transfer students who reach out to their organization. The group hopes to smooth the transition for these students, instead of making them fend for themselves. Unfortunately, the organization is currently self-funded, relying on a GoFundMe page to raise money. 

    The quickest and most useful way for the Student Government to aid transfer students, as well as represent their needs, is to grant funding to this organization. The group dedicated to helping students feel less alone shouldn’t have to be alone in the process. There are a variety of reasons a student might be transferring to UT — coming from a two-year institution, looking for a new, more pleasant experience or maybe were unable to get into UT from high school. Whatever the reason, these students are looking to be a part of a wonderful yet vast community. The University should show them that they want them here as well.

    Hamze is an international relations and global studies junior from Austin. He is an associate editor. Follow him on Twitter @adamhamz.

  • China's Sept. 3 military display is about seeking recognition for sacrifices in Second World War

    The Second World War is the deadliest armed conflict in human history in terms of the total casualties of the war. Over 60 million people were killed and the destruction was so intense that it took at least a decade for the world to recover. 

    China lost 20 million people during the Second World War, which is one-third of the total population lost during the war. Yet, China is rarely mentioned in the history books for the pivotal part they played in helping the Allies defeat the Japanese during World War II.

    On Sept. 3, for the first time China held a military parade marking the 70th anniversary the Japanese Instrument of Surrender that ended the World War II. Critics of China claim this military parade is nothing more than a stunt to show off their new military might. I believe this parade is China trying to show the lack of international attention paid to their role in the World War II. 

    China’s role in the Second World War was vital in the Allies’ victory against the Japanese. The Chinese military’s resilience in bogging down the main body of the Japanese military within China prevented the Japanese from sending vital troop reinforcements to other active theaters of war in Asia, which heavily contributed to the U.S. victory in the Pacific. Had China not actively resisted the Japanese, Japan’s ambitions to conquer all of Asia could have become a reality. China was also a member of the Cairo Conference with the U.S. and U.K. in deciding the post-war world order in Asia after the defeat of the Japanese.

    Above all, China lost close to 20 million people in this conflict, with 14 million of them civilian casualties. The fact that this sacrifice is not internationally recognized is an insult to all those who served, fought and experienced the war first hand. 

    This conflict also shaped the identity of China since 1945. The controversy surrounding China’s confrontational foreign policy in 2015 can be traced back to World War II. By understanding this conflict, we can understand China’s current view of the world and how to deal with it.

    By also recognizing China’s role in this war we can finally recognize the heroic sacrifices made by both Chinese troops and civilians for the part they played in securing the Allied victory against Japanese aggression during World War II. 

    Chen is an international relations and global studies senior from Galveston. He is an associate editor. Follow him on Twitter @ZhelunC.