College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

After appeal, SG candidates to resume campaign

Judicial Commission amends decision over Facebook controversy

By Amy Bingham

Daily Texan Staff

Print this article

Published: Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Updated: Wednesday, February 25, 2009

SG Candidates

Tamir Kalifa; The Daily Texan

Student Government presidential candidate Phillip Tau and running mate Sarah Stearns appeal the Election Supervisory Board’s decision to suspend their campaign.

Philip Tau and Sarah Michelle Stearns may resume campaigning at 10:30 a.m. today after appealing the Election Supervisory Board’s sentence Tuesday night.

The Student Government Judicial Commission lessened the board’s punishment from a $100 fine to a $75 fine and ruled that the Tau-Stearns campaign for SG president and vice president could resume 12 hours earlier. The candidates will now be allowed to participate in tonight’s debate.

“Awesome! There is justice in this world, and it’s sweet,” Tau said.

The commission declined to comment on its decision pending the release of a report in the next 24 hours.

Tau and Stearns appealed the board’s decision Tuesday night to the Judicial Commission, arguing the punishment was too severe. Tau was a member of the commission until deciding to run for SG President in January.

“I think that it’s overkill to have both the two-day suspension and the fine,” Tau said.

The election board ruled Monday night that Tau and Stearns could not participate in any campaign-related activates for 48 hours and must pay a $100 fine after a Facebook group with more than 60,000 members titled “Texas did beat OU 45-35, lest we forget” was changed to “VOTE PHILLIP AND SARAH MICHELLE FOR SG President and VP! :)” on Thursday night.

Tau and Stearns said they had nothing to do with the name change.

“I personally am really offended that our integrity is being called into question,” Stearns said.

Cesar Martinez, co-chair of the Election Supervisory Board, said inconsistencies with Tau’s testimony during Monday’s hearing was a determining factor in deciding the candidates’ punishment.

Initially, Tau said he had never met Austin Talbert, an administrator of the Facebook group but later said he had contacted him through Facebook.

Tau said at the Tuesday hearing that he had communicated with Talbert, a Texan sports writer, only through Lance Kennedy, who was an administrator of the group until Friday afternoon.

Both Kennedy and Talbert declined to comment Tuesday.

“It could not be proved that [Tau and Stearns] were directly involved, otherwise they would have been disqualified,” Martinez said.

Harrison Yeager filed a complaint Tuesday afternoon asking the election board to allow Tau and Stearns to participate in the debate.

“I do feel that to not allow candidates to participate in an open debate where they will have the chance to vocalize their platform is an injustice to the student body,” Yeager said.

All candidates running for a Student Government office or editor-in-chief of The Daily Texan were invited to attend the debate.

Student Government President Keshav Rajagopalan said that while losing two days of campaigning will be difficult to make up, it will not be a decisive factor in the outcome of the election.

“If they’re running a great campaign, it’s nothing that can’t be recovered from,” Rajagopalan said.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

11 comments

Your name
Tue Mar 3 2009 09:29
Wouldn't all the money going to SG be better used to fund scholarships? This seems like wasteful resume fodder....
A thought
Fri Feb 27 2009 10:36
I think the reason Tau was chosen as a commissioner is that they serve 2 yr terms and cant be apart of the assembly i.e. rep spots, so it was a maneuver to show humility while taking him out of the election running this year by keshav, i think thats why he had to quit the position..
Socrates
Fri Feb 27 2009 01:42
Wait did Tau even do anything for the judicial commission other than fill space? also if keshav and sg have no sense of ethics then how is it that tau got into the judicial commission? perhaps our friends are not really looking at the picture as a whole.
SG has no ethics
Thu Feb 26 2009 01:24
wanna talk about ethics, how about the invisible ticket that is being run...the same people who flyer for liam one hour put on a minator shirt the next, and then a hobson and a stien...not to mention they all sit together in the west mall and basically campaign together...

and so he served on the commission...how about the fact that the ESB was more than half tejas and the rest appointed by keshav who also appointed liam...ethics, SG and ethics dont go together...well at least not the current SG which is what liam seems to be heading towards..

so dont even try to talk ethics when it comes to liam

ME
Thu Feb 26 2009 00:31
A NAME OF A FACEBOOK GROUP WAS CHANGED. WHO THE HELL CARES.
Jezzus
Wed Feb 25 2009 23:58
What's the point? No one cares about SG anyways
Friends can be enemies
Wed Feb 25 2009 16:14
Nice job supporters of Tau and Stearns...can we expect more of this behavior if they are elected? If an individual is running for office, their contacts better be clean and ethical...whoops!
Your name
Wed Feb 25 2009 13:44
so wait tau used to serve on this judicial commission? wow. unethical behavior, count 2.
Z Prophet
Wed Feb 25 2009 12:13
Obviously Tau was part of the decision to change the name of the FB group... if he and stearns really wanted to be ethical they would've had it changed right when they "found out" about it
Bob Crunchy
Wed Feb 25 2009 10:50
It seems like kind of a silly rule to begin with.
Your name
Wed Feb 25 2009 10:26
It's only fair they are allowed back into the debate, even if they were involved with the name change, I don't doubt the integrity of their platform.






log out